Actually that is incorrect. Everyone pays the sales tax. Those who choose to pay monthly pay the sales tax up front. For most phones there are 2 different prices. One for customers and one for non-customers.Yes, I did this with my note 3. You do pay more if you do this, mainly due to sales tax, which doesn't apply if you buy in installments.
Yes, you can buy phones from T-Mobile without a plan. They do charge you more for not being a customer. Usually its anywhere from $50-$150 more.
Usually the price of phones for non-customers is higher, with the exception of iPhones. It doesn't matter which channel you use, if you're not a customer they will find out when you attempt to purchase the device. Best way to get the lower price is to be a customer.Wait...you're saying non-customers' price for phones is $50-150 more than the full retail price that's listed on TMO's website?
And what's the best channel for a non-customer to buy a phone?
Usually the price of phones for non-customers is higher, with the exception of iPhones.
It doesn't matter which channel you use, if you're not a customer they will find out when you attempt to purchase the device.
Huh. I didn't know that TMO even sold phones to non-customers, much less at a higher price. I imagine there's no publicly accessible documentation on this?
Right, but what's the most hassle-free way to do it? Can one do it online? I imagine stores wouldn't want to do this as they wouldn't be earning any commission...
That said tmobile will not unlock it for you on day one but att will.
This sounds like a grey area (which is why I'm not surprised to see at least one carrier exploit it.) As per the February 11 rules, there are clear requirements and courses of action for prepaid and postpaid customers. But if you're buying the phone from TMO and no service plan, what are you?
AT&T is YMMV too. The BlackBerry Passport launched recently (post-February 11,) and full-retail paying customers were being told to wait 90 days to get the code, which is an obvious violation. I think it can be chalked up to not knowing the new rules, though.
Att has a 60 day requirement on the account and not device. Tmobile has a 60 day waiting period on the device no matter how old your account is.
Post-paid devices will qualify for unlocking as soon as the device is paid off or the service contract ends
Tmobiles rules are ridiculous and could lead to a lawsuit. A fully paid phone should be unlocked ASAP. End ofFor fully paid off devices, both--especially TMO's requirement--sound like a violation of the CTIA postpaid device unlocking requirements, which say:
If you're a non-customer buying just a phone, obviously TMO is not going to EIP it for you. But which category of unlocking rules do you fall under--the more customer-friendly postpaid, or carrier-friendly prepaid? I'm guessing it's the latter, unfortunately.
Tmobiles rules are ridiculous and could lead to a lawsuit. A fully paid phone should be unlocked ASAP.
Actually that is incorrect. Everyone pays the sales tax. Those who choose to pay monthly pay the sales tax up front. For most phones there are 2 different prices. One for customers and one for non-customers.
Sent using my HTC One M9 via the Uncarrier
That said tmobile will not unlock it for you on day one but att will.
As per tmobile official policyI have had a different experience with this. I bought my Note 4 (pre-order) online .. and paid it off in full 1 month later. I called and they sent me an unlock code within a few hours.