Wow. I was really surprised that Rob Pegarora the Consumer Techie at the Washington Post buried the EVO4G. His INC review a month ago was a Rave which also surprised me as he is usually hyper critical. Mostly he decried the battery life which he said did not match the claim and was much worse than the INC. He of course blasted Sprints coverage in the DC Metro which is true, said the claimed download speeds were not attainable and not much better than the INC. No optical or track ball makes web site navigation difficult (funny, I never use mine) but like the kick stand. Spent half the review warning users about the "real" monthly costs Sprint will charge to enjoy the full features of the phone.
First mostly bad review I have seen, but this guy has no ties to any manufacturers or carriers and the Post, if nothing else, has journalistic integrity when it comes to interaction with commercial entities.
First mostly bad review I have seen, but this guy has no ties to any manufacturers or carriers and the Post, if nothing else, has journalistic integrity when it comes to interaction with commercial entities.