vzwuser76
Well-known member
- Jan 28, 2011
- 1,669
- 26
- 0
Get the pitch fork guys!! Let him have it ????????????
I'm partial to torches myself.
Get the pitch fork guys!! Let him have it ????????????
I'm partial to torches myself.
Here's what I get from my note 9 camera: http://imgur.com/a/dIEQGYz
Same here. I bought the Pixel 2XL in April because it was supposed to have the best camera. Maybe it did, maybe it didn't. I didn't have it long enough to really know for certain. What I did know is that I'm not a "pure stock Android" fan. I missed my Samsung experience! For the first time, I let the overall phone be the deciding factor, not the camera and bought the S9+. Now I have the N9. I hope to never leave Samsung again.
It's not meant to replace professional cameras
Well I didn't want to disappoint Almeuit keep this thread non boring??????
I'm liking torches in case he escapes the pitch fork ????????????
Kill it with FIRE!!!
People refuse to spend time to actually learn photography to better their photos ...
Am I to understand that the pictures you as a pro and me as not a pro, take on the same camera, will look any different? I'm not sure how that would work. I mean you point the thing and press a button...
Also for the record I DO expect the technology to do all the work. That's literally the definition of technology. It's a tool to make our lives better.
Am I to understand that the pictures you as a pro and me as not a pro, take on the same camera, will look any different? I'm not sure how that would work. I mean you point the thing and press a button...
Firstly, I'm not a pro...
A camera has limitations... There is no monster camera that records the entire dynamic range of every specific scene...
So you have to learn how to use it... Like a tool that's part of a process to achieve the goal you want... This is where most people mess up... They never learn why their photos suck.. or why the camera isn't doing what they want .. most people just come to conclusion that the camera just sucks and I'm talking between flagship to flagship... There ARE ****ty cameras in crappy phone... The OP posted example photos to make a point... I'm just saying that it was laughable...
The processing I've seen Samsung doing with low light is... Not great... The pixels def do great... But people want to point the flaw out like that's the main reason they can't live the phone when in reality, I'm betting their photography sucks and improving it would be more cost effective than jumping ship to ship but that's never mentioned...
Dunno if this matters but just for neutrality, I use a v35.. so I'm not on "team pixel" or "team Samsung"
So I wonder... Between the example shots, what were the ISO differences?
Is it possible that the Samsung is using 6400 while Google uses 3200?? What was the shutter speed difference? Is googles chip back side illumated? I honestly don't know..
Only example photos were posted... And ones that really weren't that different too...
Hey, Guys...
I have plenty of photography experience and have been using pro cameras for years. To include, but not limited to C5D2, N D850FX among others.... I also have a studio and shoot lots of different photos under a lot of different conditions. (I'll attach a random photo).
But I purposely haven't brought any of that up because that's not the point of the thread.
All I'm speaking about is how I was spoiled with the Pixel 2XL was so good at auto photos that I was blown away. I was just taken aback when the Note 9 choked at first.
I'm not, nor would I ever, compare a phone camera to a $4K+ piece of equipment.... Just phone-to-phone.
That's all. Nothing more, nothing less.
(oh, and Verizon juts replaced my screen, so it's back to normal).
..... Just curious if I was alone.
Thanks for listening.View attachment 291647View attachment 291648
Oh wow ... Well then... Don't I look like an ***....