TechCaptain
Well-known member
- Jan 3, 2015
- 123
- 0
- 0
I mean, in the Pixel 5 doesn't have flagship specs like the rumors suggest, I'd probably drop it too.
Depends on real world usage usage though. The 3a is a perfectly capable phone, not I missed wireless charging. But from a performance perspective, it was just fine. So if they can meet half way between the budget device and the $1,000 phone and then start the price at $600, that would be perfect.I mean, in the Pixel 5 doesn't have flagship specs like the rumors suggest, I'd probably drop it too.
I wholeheartedly agree. I mean Pixel 5 even if it's not a flagship phone with flagship specs but the right price like we're all talking about, I'll seriously consider it. The wireless charging my 3XL I don't even use. I still use a wired charger that came in the box. One of the things I probably want in it the next phone I purchased is 5G millimeter wavelength. The networking infrastructure is also not ready yet for the masses.Depends on real world usage usage though. The 3a is a perfectly capable phone, not I missed wireless charging. But from a performance perspective, it was just fine. So if they can meet half way between the budget device and the $1,000 phone and then start the price at $600, that would be perfect.
Exactly. I'll want some future proof and the phone always pushing forward in some regards. But the camera is top notch and I love stock Google. Just give me enough power to do basic tasks and I'm good.I wholeheartedly agree. I mean Pixel 5 even if it's not a flagship phone with flagship specs but the right price like we're all talking about, I'll seriously consider it. The wireless charging my 3XL I don't even use. I still use a wired charger that came in the box. One of the things I probably want in it the next phone I purchased is 5G millimeter wavelength. The networking infrastructure is also not ready yet for the masses.
Looks like they pulling out high end phones , what's to become the A seriesIt'll be horrible news if Pixel 5 doesn't have SD 865, I mean there is the 'a' series for the mid range and cheaper option. It'll suck if they drop the latest available SD 8XX at that time. I don't care about prices need the latest processor specs and anyways they have the cheaper option with a series.
I wonder if they are going to have an "a" series going forward. To be honest with you, if they just make the Pixel 5 like the "a" and didn't produce another device for the year and the Pixel 5 was priced at $399, it wouldn't bother me one bit.It'll be horrible news if Pixel 5 doesn't have SD 865, I mean there is the 'a' series for the mid range and cheaper option. It'll suck if they drop the latest available SD 8XX at that time. I don't care about prices need the latest processor specs and anyways they have the cheaper option with a series.
See now, that's a better question.Looks like they pulling out high end phones , what's to become the A series
I wonder if they are going to have an "a" series going forward. To be honest with you, if they just make the Pixel 5 like the "a" and didn't produce another device for the year and the Pixel 5 was priced at $399, it wouldn't bother me one bit.
Depends on real world usage usage though. The 3a is a perfectly capable phone, not I missed wireless charging. But from a performance perspective, it was just fine. So if they can meet half way between the budget device and the $1,000 phone and then start the price at $600, that would be perfect.
Sales. If no one is buying the higher end model and the cheaper model is selling twice as many then it becomes simple math. Plus, when the Pixel 4 was released, look at all the criticism it received. It the same phone was priced at $399 with some downgrades it would be the best mid-range device on the market.Sure but it’ll will bother me, what’s wrong with the current option? They satisfy both the cheaper and higher end option with the a series and regular pixel series.
Sales. If no one is buying the higher end model and the cheaper model is selling twice as many then it becomes simple math. Plus, when the Pixel 4 was released, look at all the criticism it received. It the same phone was priced at $399 with some downgrades it would be the best mid-range device on the market.
I understand that, was just saying I’ll be disappointed with no higher end option. Have no interest in buying some mid range processor and yes I know there isn’t big difference but still no interest![]()
Just sad it finally took toll of the awesome high end pixel phones. Still love the 4 Xl. Is it overpriced, may be or may be not but i never cared. Anyway end of rant and I’ll see what happens in fall.
It's a great phone. The only reason I went for the higher end 4xl is because I was able to get it for $650. That's where I feel like the phone should be. And only $175 more than the 3a XL. But you can't go wrong with the 3a either. My daughter has been using one for about 10 months now and she's had zero issues.I feel like if and when I go back to the Pixel - if I like the 5 more than my S10 - I would hope there would be a higher end model to choose out of the lineup. I like having the latest processor and a great camera.
That being said, I was extremely tempted by the Pixel 3a - I almost bought the Not Pink version a couple of times - so I can understand if Google does decide to go that route. But there will always be those users who buy top-of-the-line phones. But do those sales outweigh midrange sales? Probably not.
It's a great phone. The only reason I went for the higher end 4xl is because I was able to get it for $650. That's where I feel like the phone should be. And only $175 more than the 3a XL. But you can't go wrong with the 3a either. My daughter has been using one for about 10 months now and she's had zero issues.
It takes only few days to get used to. Honestly I miss the secure face unlock on my Samsung phones compared to my 4 XL or iPhone. It's much easier with the face unlock than the in display fingerprint on the Samsung phones. Yes the Samsung phones have face unlock but I'm not using it since it's not a secure face unlock like that on iPhone and Pixel.What a great deal on the 4 XL! I can definitely see why you would have gone for it. I'm just hoping the 5 has an in-display fingerprint sensor or some kind of fingerprint biometrics. I am okay with using Face Unlock in conjunction with my in-display fingerprint sensor on my S10; but I am unsettled with Face Unlock being the only method of security on future devices.
Agree ...and Samsung should of never ditched Iris Scanner was pretty good and secure .It takes only few days to get used to. Honestly I miss the secure face unlock on my Samsung phones compared to my 4 XL or iPhone. It's much easier with the face unlock than the in display fingerprint on the Samsung phones. Yes the Samsung phones have face unlock but I'm using it since it's not a secure face unlock like that on iPhone and Pixel.