Samsumg galaxy watch/ LTE version is better because 1.5 GB RAM ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Android Central Question
  • Start date Start date
A

Android Central Question

Bluetooth version has only half of RAM as the LTE version , does it matthers? Can you feel the difference ? Or is absolutly not important ? Pls help
 
I moved this to the Galaxy Watch forum for more specific traffic.
 
That extra amount of ram is for the LTE chip and needed software to run the LTE. I doubt you would see a difference.
 
FWIW, I had the bluetooth S3, sold it and bought the LTE version. The LTE version was much slower than the bluetooth version in all day to day operations. Actually, it was not only slow but also buggy and just unreliable. I'm not sure if it was under spec'd and they fixed it this go-around by adding extra RAM.

Personally, for me, I am done with LTE in a watch. It just wasn't worth the money for me.
 
FWIW, I had the bluetooth S3, sold it and bought the LTE version. The LTE version was much slower than the bluetooth version in all day to day operations. Actually, it was not only slow but also buggy and just unreliable. I'm not sure if it was under spec'd and they fixed it this go-around by adding extra RAM.

Personally, for me, I am done with LTE in a watch. It just wasn't worth the money for me.

Both versions only had 768MB Ram. That may have been why they doubled for GW.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
955,092
Messages
6,963,755
Members
3,163,195
Latest member
yodadady