Google has already entered in the android related hardware manufacturing with it's Flagship tablet Google Pixel C, which happens to be a notebook that has android OS instead of Chromebook OS. This post tries to explore the possible advantages and disadvantages if Google ever releases a Pixel phone that is manufactured in-house by Google and not by Samsung or HTC etc.
Main advantages -
1) Fairtrade supply chain and manufacturing process - This is closest to my heart. Complete control over the process will enable Google to chose it's own suppliers for raw materials and labour friendly Manufacturing sub contracters. Nexus line might be pure android but it's far from anything pure when it comes to ethics. For a company that defines itself by the motto that's worded - "Don't be evil", Google has a long way to go, And frankly is no better than Apple when it comes to labour laws.
Inspired by success of Fairphone2 i wrote a post about it on androidcentral
2) The Pixel design -
Google can further expand on the praiseworthy design language that google showcased with Pixel C tablet.
3) A device that can stand it's ground against an iPhone or a Surfacephone-
Nexus line was supposed to be about marriage of software with hardware that can make a machine perform better than other android phones without the baggage of forced crapware and unwanted skins. But sadly Nexus line was never able to prove this point. Compared to other android flagships from makers like LG, Samsung* and HTC, Nexus performs and ages like a midrange device despite being a flagship. Nexus has to move from "good enough" to the "Best". Something Microsoft did manage to do with it's Surface line. Surface pro 4 is not just a good enough Windows convertible but actually the Best. Nexus may be pure android software but it has never been the best android hardware. Here's an article on it -
Main disadvantages-
1) Damaging relations with other android hardware manufacturers
Frankly tablets are a dying breed and Google Pixel C was a premium product with a premium price. Much like Surface line despite its fame, does not effect other windows hardware's global marketshare due to it's high pricing, similarly Google pixel C this did not threaten other android manufacturers, which have many mid range and low range tablets in the market. BUT unlike low profile geeky niche Nexus phones a pixel phone has to be the best android Flagship and this will certainly irk Samsung and HTC.
2) it will distract other much more important longterm projects of Google-
Unlike Apple or Samsung, Google is a services, information and OS company, Nexus range is nothing more than a formality and hardly brings Google any money. Hardware is a much more risky and time consuming bussiness. Afterall, Microsoft did manage to keep every competitor (including Apple) in the shadows for decades without ever having to manufacture a single PC itself. For, a long time,* a windows OS CDs remained the only significant hardware Microsoft sold. So, may be a Pixel phone brand may be the best thing for android users but Nexus line is by far the best option for the Google as a company in the long run. Android is still ahead of iOS, macOS and Windowsphone and probably WindowsPC (not including non-geniune windows and XP), so no reason for google to go deeper into harware battle if it's already winning the war.
So what is your take on it? Do you want a fairtrade Pixelphone, Nexus partnerships or you are happy with Flagships of third party manufacturers Samsung, HTC etc?
Also, there is no guarantee that the Pixel phone if it ever comes out will be fairtrade, most likely it will be not. In that case you are better off with an iphone or a note i guess. I for one might have to move to europe to buy a FAIRPHONE2.
Main advantages -
1) Fairtrade supply chain and manufacturing process - This is closest to my heart. Complete control over the process will enable Google to chose it's own suppliers for raw materials and labour friendly Manufacturing sub contracters. Nexus line might be pure android but it's far from anything pure when it comes to ethics. For a company that defines itself by the motto that's worded - "Don't be evil", Google has a long way to go, And frankly is no better than Apple when it comes to labour laws.
Inspired by success of Fairphone2 i wrote a post about it on androidcentral
2) The Pixel design -
Google can further expand on the praiseworthy design language that google showcased with Pixel C tablet.
3) A device that can stand it's ground against an iPhone or a Surfacephone-
Nexus line was supposed to be about marriage of software with hardware that can make a machine perform better than other android phones without the baggage of forced crapware and unwanted skins. But sadly Nexus line was never able to prove this point. Compared to other android flagships from makers like LG, Samsung* and HTC, Nexus performs and ages like a midrange device despite being a flagship. Nexus has to move from "good enough" to the "Best". Something Microsoft did manage to do with it's Surface line. Surface pro 4 is not just a good enough Windows convertible but actually the Best. Nexus may be pure android software but it has never been the best android hardware. Here's an article on it -
Main disadvantages-
1) Damaging relations with other android hardware manufacturers
Frankly tablets are a dying breed and Google Pixel C was a premium product with a premium price. Much like Surface line despite its fame, does not effect other windows hardware's global marketshare due to it's high pricing, similarly Google pixel C this did not threaten other android manufacturers, which have many mid range and low range tablets in the market. BUT unlike low profile geeky niche Nexus phones a pixel phone has to be the best android Flagship and this will certainly irk Samsung and HTC.
2) it will distract other much more important longterm projects of Google-
Unlike Apple or Samsung, Google is a services, information and OS company, Nexus range is nothing more than a formality and hardly brings Google any money. Hardware is a much more risky and time consuming bussiness. Afterall, Microsoft did manage to keep every competitor (including Apple) in the shadows for decades without ever having to manufacture a single PC itself. For, a long time,* a windows OS CDs remained the only significant hardware Microsoft sold. So, may be a Pixel phone brand may be the best thing for android users but Nexus line is by far the best option for the Google as a company in the long run. Android is still ahead of iOS, macOS and Windowsphone and probably WindowsPC (not including non-geniune windows and XP), so no reason for google to go deeper into harware battle if it's already winning the war.
So what is your take on it? Do you want a fairtrade Pixelphone, Nexus partnerships or you are happy with Flagships of third party manufacturers Samsung, HTC etc?
Also, there is no guarantee that the Pixel phone if it ever comes out will be fairtrade, most likely it will be not. In that case you are better off with an iphone or a note i guess. I for one might have to move to europe to buy a FAIRPHONE2.