Snapdragon 615 vs 617?

Eclectech

Well-known member
Apr 6, 2012
85
4
0
Visit site
Looking at Qualcomm's chip comparison site, it's interesting HTC chose this particular chip when they could've chosen others, but I think they were really looking for something they could optimize around performance and battery life. The 615 can actually handle higher resolution displays but the 617 made more sense because they were only outfitting the phone with a 1080p.
 

Habiib

Well-known member
Sep 25, 2011
701
4
0
Visit site
Looking at Qualcomm's chip comparison site, it's interesting HTC chose this particular chip when they could've chosen others, but I think they were really looking for something they could optimize around performance and battery life. The 615 can actually handle higher resolution displays but the 617 made more sense because they were only outfitting the phone with a 1080p.

According to an article I read on Anandtech, the other QC processors weren't available at the time the A9 was in development.

Posted via the Android Central App
 

DJ Grand Theft Audio

Well-known member
Feb 20, 2015
131
0
0
Visit site
Snapdragon 617 running 8 cores with 3gb ram. How the he'll is a 2150mAh battery going to last.

Or is this 617 really battery efficient? They didn't have to put in a bigger battery.
 

Jon_Doh

Well-known member
Jul 10, 2011
399
6
0
Visit site
Snapdragon 617 running 8 cores with 3gb ram. How the he'll is a 2150mAh battery going to last.

Or is this 617 really battery efficient? They didn't have to put in a bigger battery.

The 617 is supposed to be battery efficient, as is the AMOLED screen and Marshmallow. They couldn't put a bigger battery in because of the thinness of the phone. I have an M7 and it's thin to me. If they had made the A9 as thick as the HTC One M7 they could have put a much bigger battery in it and had a rockin' phone that was still thin when compared to the competition.
 

dorelse

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2011
162
5
0
Visit site
The 617 is supposed to be battery efficient, as is the AMOLED screen and Marshmallow. They couldn't put a bigger battery in because of the thinness of the phone. I have an M7 and it's thin to me. If they had made the A9 as thick as the HTC One M7 they could have put a much bigger battery in it and had a rockin' phone that was still thin when compared to the competition.

Yep, I agree. Also have an M7, and if they'd have stuck a 3,000 mah battery in there it could have been a killer multi-day device (or stood up to some really heavy usage on a daily basis). I would have loved that phone.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
948,522
Messages
6,939,539
Members
3,161,178
Latest member
thata69420