Snapdragon 8+ gen 1

[wrich2005]

Does anyone else feel duped by the fact that the S22U has such terrible battery life, yet the Z Fold 4 with only a 4400 MAH battery, and 7.6 inch screen is getting the exact same battery life in most tests? This phone would be perfect in my opinion if it didn't have this Achilles heel of a bad battery life. I almost wish they'd mid year refresh the S22U with the 8+ gen1 going forward...

 

[bkdodger2]

I've not had bad battery with the s22U... I usually don't go by these side by side tests I'd rather go real world... But that said I'm sure the new gen processor from the looks of it will be a better performer but that's the way it goes when you're starting new phones and I'm sure Samsung had already committed to the previous gen with S22 production

 

[mustang7757]

Battery been very good on s22u
Little over a day with 8 SOT

 

[ffejjj]

Nope. Battery life has been excellent. No matter how great of a phone we buy we always know that something better is on the way. It's the tech life.

With that said I'll be happy to rock this S22 Ultra for the next year or 2

 

[nathasnajperowa]

The reason of poor battery life is Samsung itself, i mean which company produced processors.
Both Qualcomm snapdragon 888 and gen 1 as the exynos of course are made by Samsung.
Snapdragon gen 1+ is made by TMSC, the company making Apple bionic hearts.
TMSC is superior over the ones made by Samsung.
Luckily the prediction for next year is all around the world S23 ULTRA will be powered by snapdragon made by TMSC.
The 23 series should both have excellent both efficiency and battery life like was in snapdragon 865+.
It's not a gossip but fact

 

[fuzzylumpkin]

The reason of poor battery life is Samsung itself, i mean which company produced processors.
Both Qualcomm snapdragon 888 and gen 1 as the exynos of course are made by Samsung.
Snapdragon gen 1+ is made by TMSC, the company making Apple bionic hearts.
TMSC is superior over the ones made by Samsung.
Luckily the prediction for next year is all around the world S23 ULTRA will be powered by snapdragon made by TMSC.
The 23 series should both have excellent both efficiency and battery life like was in snapdragon 865+.
It's not a gossip but fact

Cool story... You spelled TSMC wrong.

 

[nathasnajperowa]

My mistake but the rest is true

 

[bkdodger2]

Cool story... You spelled TSMC wrong.

And you spelled Kool wrong

 

[mustang7757]

The reason of poor battery life is Samsung itself, i mean which company produced processors.
Both Qualcomm snapdragon 888 and gen 1 as the exynos of course are made by Samsung.
Snapdragon gen 1+ is made by TMSC, the company making Apple bionic hearts.
TMSC is superior over the ones made by Samsung.
Luckily the prediction for next year is all around the world S23 ULTRA will be powered by snapdragon made by TMSC.
The 23 series should both have excellent both efficiency and battery life like was in snapdragon 865+.
It's not a gossip but fact

We don't know how the Snap dragon connectivity going be around the world that used Exynos chip for many years, we see if rumors are true

 

[nathasnajperowa]

There's no leaks about new exynos and the rumors say Samsung gonna focus on its own blowin mind processors for its flagship smartphones in next 2-3 years release.
So 2023-24 they stay calm, let the lottery go and after they plan to globally use only their own chip.
The biggest gap and hall of shame was difference in 20 series, snapdragon 865/865+ chips were crushing the infamous exynos 990.
All the test and benchmark, battery life, real life experience pointed there's no competition between the two.
Exynos 990 was definitely the bad batch, no exceptions.
So the next two years exynos prediction and Samsung's claims they try to make exynos competitive to snapdragon.
In 2022 also with GPU cooperation with AMD (Xclipse 920 graphics for exynos).
Everything in real world didn't work out.
Every comparison on YT, social apps and nerds and even consumers pointed the weakness of exynos.
But definitely the gap in 2021 and 2022 is smaller than in 2020.
UK and European consumers buying inferior product for higher price than in uS are pissed off and already loose their patience.
I'm no clairvoyant but betchya we'll see everywhere snapdragon.
Keep the fingers crossed

 

[mustang7757]

There's no leaks about new exynos and the rumors say Samsung gonna focus on its own blowin mind processors for its flagship smartphones in next 2-3 years release.
So 2023-24 they stay calm, let the lottery go and after they plan to globally use only their own chip.
The biggest gap and hall of shame was difference in 20 series, snapdragon 865/865+ chips were crushing the infamous exynos 990.
All the test and benchmark, battery life, real life experience pointed there's no competition between the two.
Exynos 990 was definitely the bad batch, no exceptions.
So the next two years exynos prediction and Samsung's claims they try to make exynos competitive to snapdragon.
In 2022 also with GPU cooperation with AMD (Xclipse 920 graphics for exynos).
Everything in real world didn't work out.
Every comparison on YT, social apps and nerds and even consumers pointed the weakness of exynos.
But definitely the gap in 2021 and 2022 is smaller than in 2020.
UK and European consumers buying inferior product for higher price than in uS are pissed off and already loose their patience.
I'm no clairvoyant but betchya we'll see everywhere snapdragon.
Keep the fingers crossed

Well there was back in the day Snap dragon users were envious of Exynos people so I can can understand them.

 

[nathasnajperowa]

Well there was back in the day Snap dragon users were envious of Exynos people so I can can understand them.

It was the exception for the overheating snapdragon 810 chip, the only year Samsung used globally exynos
I'm from Europe and have comparison between the two, from note series 9,10;plus, 20 ultra and now s22 ultra.
Every iteration first i bought the official exynos realese and after imported the US or Hongkong version (snapdragon).
The difference was huge in favor to snapdragon.
This year is the only year i didn't use the snapdragon version (the price difference was like 500$ and no at all warranty) but was following every thread and yt comparison.
My conclusion is both are a little bit crap in battery life, adreno of course is more powerful in games and game optimization, in contrary exynos 2200 has a native V1 codec build in to better video watching experience.
The chip architecture is similar

 

[mustang7757]

It was the exception for the overheating snapdragon 810 chip, the only year Samsung used globally exynos
I'm from Europe and have comparison between the two, from note series 9,10;plus, 20 ultra and now s22 ultra.
Every iteration first i bought the official exynos realese and after imported the US or Hongkong version (snapdragon).
The difference was huge in favor to snapdragon.
This year is the only year i didn't use the snapdragon version (the price difference was like 500$ and no at all warranty) but was following every thread and yt comparison.
My conclusion is both are a little bit crap in battery life, adreno of course is more powerful in games and game optimization, in contrary exynos 2200 has a native V1 codec build in to better video watching experience.
The chip architecture is similar

Yeah I have long history with Samsung, I'm in the US , almost every Note from Note 2 up to S22u (yes that is a Note) and almost every S series from s3 to S10+
The s6 in US had Exynos first time and was happy thinking finally got a good chip lol
(Including s4 Google play edition)

 

[nathasnajperowa]

Don't know why Samsung can't play competitive in chips, they are so good at so many fields, making top notch smartphones, displays for themselves and being supplier's for iPhone and other company, something is off in their chip department and nobody knows what besides their interest and supplies chain.
For me as the end consumers i wish i get the same product for its name.

 

[mustang7757]

Don't know why Samsung can't play competitive in chips, they are so good at so many fields, making top notch smartphones, displays for themselves and being supplier's for iPhone and other company, something is off in their chip department and nobody knows what besides their interest and supplies chain.
For me as the end consumers i wish i get the same product for its name.

They also did this for cameras one could have Sony cameras and others would have Samsung version lol

 

[nathasnajperowa]

Indeed, their camera sensor is called Isocell, and as you can guess is inferior to Sony sensor used in snapdragon version.
I wonder why Europe is for them beta field for testing own product?
Maybe CEO in gap college year had some bad experience with demanding liberated French girl and it's his long-term revenge?
Just kidding of course

 

[mustang7757]

Indeed, their camera sensor is called Isocell, and as you can guess is inferior to Sony sensor used in snapdragon version.
I wonder why Europe is for them beta field for testing own product?
Maybe CEO in gap college year had some bad experience with demanding liberated French girl and it's his long-term revenge?
Just kidding of course

Can say same for Pixel users to the US lol
I do own pixels also

 

[nathasnajperowa]

Let's hope for things getting better in 2023. Michael Jordan's number can't be wrong

 

[mustang7757]

Let's hope for things getting better in 2023. Michael Jordan's number can't be wrong

For sure

 

[nathasnajperowa]

And you spelled Kool wrong

Thanks for support and sharing non toxic experience, appreciate a lot