D13H4RD2L1V3
Retired Moderator
- Sep 4, 2013
- 4,407
- 0
- 0
I'm not impressed with the G5.
After dealing with #BootloopGate on the G4, I really thought LG would step up their quality control game. As it turned out, nope. Backlight bleeding issues, heavy use of plastic that's "supposedly" for the antenna, the chin not being flush with the rest of the phone, the LCD blooming because the panel is so damn thin, and it's just, ugh.
It's a $600+ phone and with this sort of quality-control, I'm afraid it's hard for me to recommend it. It had the potential to be a solid alternative to phones like the Samsung Galaxy S7 and the HTC 10, but unless LG is serious about their QC, the G5 doesn't hold up well enough against its chief rival.
LG's inconsistent quality control along with issues with my G4 is why I'm selling the G4 soon and purchasing the upcoming Galaxy Note 6 as its replacement. The 2 longest-surviving smartphones in my house are all Samsung devices, so at least I can trust them for making a device that lasts for more than a year.
After dealing with #BootloopGate on the G4, I really thought LG would step up their quality control game. As it turned out, nope. Backlight bleeding issues, heavy use of plastic that's "supposedly" for the antenna, the chin not being flush with the rest of the phone, the LCD blooming because the panel is so damn thin, and it's just, ugh.
It's a $600+ phone and with this sort of quality-control, I'm afraid it's hard for me to recommend it. It had the potential to be a solid alternative to phones like the Samsung Galaxy S7 and the HTC 10, but unless LG is serious about their QC, the G5 doesn't hold up well enough against its chief rival.
LG's inconsistent quality control along with issues with my G4 is why I'm selling the G4 soon and purchasing the upcoming Galaxy Note 6 as its replacement. The 2 longest-surviving smartphones in my house are all Samsung devices, so at least I can trust them for making a device that lasts for more than a year.