Do you currently have Sprint? If you research, you would see the only thing sprint has scratched has been WiMax. NV has taken long yes, that's because the network is from scratch. They aren't just upgrading, they are rebuilding it from 0. If you didn't know, Spark falls under NV as that's the whole purpose for NV, rolling out LTE on band 25 and then expanding to bands 26 and 45: aka A-LTE. I don't see ANY other network doing that. Just think of it this way, Sprint is going to blast of from the 1990's to 2020 by end of next year. So when another network scratches up some plans, then rebuilds its entire infrastructure from scratch AND deploys A-LTE fast in under a year with NO hiccups, let me know and I'll come back here and eat my words.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using AC Forums mobile app
I've had Sprint since 2004. I switched to Tmobile a month ago, Tmobile doesn't even have 20x20 mhz spectrum in my area. From what I've researched, most Tmobile can deploy is 15x15 in chicago, good enough for me since all their towers have a fiber backahul. I'm in a Spark market (Chicago) I can certainly tell you that Sprint's network is the worst its ever been. I've made countless bad decisions by sticking with Sprint hoping they would fix their network. They, in fact, did the opposite. Their 3G speeds are the slowest they've ever been, their LTE is a complete joke.
I'm in a spark market, The fastest speed I've gotten with my nexus 5 was about 8 mbps down. The fastest I've gotten with tmobile so far has been around 50 mbps. In my own house with full bars of LTE, I got 1 mbps with sprint, same spot gives me 40 with tmobile. Spark has been "enabled" in Chicago since December. My speeds are in fact, no better, possibly worse. You know the best thing of all. "Throttled" Tmobile speeds at 128 kbps is actually much much much more usable than Sprint's 3G, the most I've ever been able to pull from Sprint's 3G the last few months was 0.02 mbps down and that's with extremely high latency (close to 500-600 ms ping)
Sprint's all talk. Let me know when they actually fix their network. I used to never get a drop call from Sprint before. I've been getting dropped calls left and right. Maybe if this Mr. Son guy tries to actually invest money in his network things would change, but nope, he goes and tries to buy a carrier with a better network since he's so lazy to fix his own network. I can gladly post up speed test pics if I can find them to back up any claims. I'm not in a rural area, I'm 25 miles west from Chicago. The network even gets worse when I do go downtown.
Wimax, LTE, network vision, Spark etc. etc. etc. Has any of Sprint's plans gone through?
You keep saying Spark is some sort of magical new network. If what your saying is true, I've had "spark" minus the 800 mhz lte band (i'll give you that one since the update hasn't enabled that band for the nexus yet) for about 6 months now. But the problem is I do get signal with sprint (so 800 mhz lte band doesnt matter that much for me), it's just their damn backhaul that's a complete joke. You know, tmobile has deployed LTE in a year (granted they made a sound investment by previously upgrading their backhaul.) What's Sprint's excuse for continuously falling behind each and every project they've tried to set out.
The only thing Sprint has going for it is hoarding all that spectrum (more than ATT+verizon combined). But I hope FCC implements a new rule that incorporates a USE IT OR LOSE IT rule