- Nov 16, 2010
- 17,654
- 215
- 0
In case you missed it, the Moto Z doesn't have a headphone jack
The Moto Z doesn't have a headphone jack | Android Central
The Moto Z doesn't have a headphone jack | Android Central
I use 3.5mm all the time on my phones. BT just doesn't have the true to life kind of sound. Just a flat sound. For running, I love the BT headphones with no wires in the way except the back of my head. But movies and on the plane, nothing beats my Shure SE215. My Shure comes with a case so I just put the adapter in there but not ok headphones comes with a case.
Who should be worried about the change? Well, anyone who*doesn't*own expensive headphones and has no intention of getting them. If you're the type of person who spends $30 to $100 on cans, then you probably have cause for concern. You're either going to need to grapple with what is likely to be a budget adapter for your existing headphones or choose a cheap USB-C or Lightning model.
And here's the problem: The DAC and amp inside that $50 pair of digital headphones are not going to be of the same quality as those in a $500 pair. Nor will the sound they output be afforded the same time and effort. Instead of trusting in your phone's DAC and amp to output decent-quality audio at decent volumes, you'll now be contending with the choices of a company that has had to cut corners to put out headphones on a tight budget.
The argument that those spending "so little" on headphones don't care enough about sound quality to notice is plain stupid. This isn't 2007, and millions of people now leave those white earbuds in the box, where they belong. You can also buy some great headphones for less than $100, and although there are huge gains made above that price point, it's a case of diminishing returns as you approach the high end of the headphone market.
They do? I sure see them around a lot.This isn't 2007, and millions of people now leave those white earbuds in the box, where they belong.
They do? I sure see them around a lot.