Look man my brain is too messed up after the last month to be talking abt drills, spirals, and giant robots.Sent from the cockpit of Gurren Lagann
"hi" was appropriate, this guy hits every thread that has a 1st person to xx, and he hits every time, i Fricken cracked up when i saw "hi", i knew who it was!
Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums
You KNOW you'll just toss and turn if you try to sleep now. Constantly looking over at your night stand and trying to resist the temptation that is ... "HTC Software Update!"
Every? This is the only other thread I've done this in
But glad I've made a name for myself on here somehow.
Sent from the cockpit of Gurren Lagann
No, i forgot which one it was, but every one was racing for post 500 and you popped in and snaked it! Think back
Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums
That is awesome! Hell Ill drink to that lol
No, i forgot which one it was, but every one was racing for post 500 and you popped in and snaked it! Think back
Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums
I wonder if they are having this same conversation in the optimus g threads. I find it even worse that for as late as it came out it was even released with ICS. At least it sorta makes sense for the evo.
Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums
Optimus G is was faster than the EVO, and has no multitasking problems. quadcore/2gb ram. I don't think they are sweating it yet.
Number of cores over 2 is pretty much irrelevant in real-world performance on a phone (even 2 is a waste much of the time). It is even a waste on many bigger systems too, depending on the user and apps. And the Evo LTE is no certainly no slouch with the S4 chip. Most people aren't playing hugely complex FPS on a phone or trying to transcode video or trying to fold proteins in a complex scientific simulation.
However, the amount of memory (which is RAM) does make a big difference when it comes to the way an Android device can delay swapping out stuff or resorting to suspend-and-reload. 2GB is a real-world advantage for task switching; especially if your device is going to run a "heavy" launcher/environment on top of Android, like the HTC phones do.
Oops, I am supposed to be in bed...
A phone like the gs3 seemed really fast with ics.
Number of cores over 2 is pretty much irrelevant in real-world performance on a phone (even 2 is a waste much of the time). It is even a waste on many bigger systems too, depending on the user and apps. And the Evo LTE is no certainly no slouch with the S4 chip. Most people aren't playing hugely complex FPS on a phone or trying to transcode video or trying to fold proteins in a complex scientific simulation.
However, the amount of memory (which is RAM) can make a big difference when it comes to the way an Android device can delay swapping out stuff or resorting to suspend-and-reload. 2GB is a real-world advantage for task switching; especially if your device is going to run a "heavy" launcher/environment on top of Android, like the HTC phones do. Of course, I would guess that 90% or more of Android users have no concept about task switching vs. multitasking vs. suspend-resume, etc. (Don't feel sad, probably 99% of iOS users don't)
Oops, I am supposed to be in bed...
That is more a function of tweaking the user response code and not number of cores or even CPU/GPU speeds. The benchmarks show pretty clearly that, overall, the GS3 is not faster than the Evo LTE.
... or trying to fold proteins in a complex scientific simulation.