No removable battery = no go.
Apparently not learned the lessons of Galaxy 7.
Good luck with getting a new phone.No removable battery = no go.
Apparently not learned the lessons of Galaxy 7.
When was the last time a Note had a removable battery? Samsung is not going to go back to removable batteries....time for everyone to move past this idea.
Then read up on why the N7 battery had problems. It really had nothing to do with being removable.
If having a removable battery is a requirement for you to buy a new phone....good luck!![]()
Even if the Note 7 had a removable battery, you'd had to take it out, send it to Samsung and have no phone.
New phones with new batteries weren't available right away, so no battery would be either. People had to get replacement temporary phones. The replacement was better than no phone IMO.
Every heard of ZeroLemon? they provide replacement batteries, an alternative to OEM. Mugen and others also.
Ever heard of concept of having a backup battery? I wouldn't send anything anywhere, but wait for an upgraded battery to arrive while using an aftermarket one.
Galaxy 7, that was an expensive lesson.
The thing about fixed, non-user replaceable batteries that is the phone is planned obsolescence. The Li-ion cell can only take so many charges. Maybe 1000-1500 cycles. but its performance begins to degrade whether you use it or not, even just sitting there, charged. So after a year of charging and discharging, x number of cycles, it won't work at an optimum level like new. It won't fail but will have reduced capacity versus a new Li-ion.
So you buy this nice expensive phone that retails like a laptop for $900 or something and then you have to upgrade to Galaxy Note 10 in a few years when it comes out. Instead of just installing a newer battery.
No reason why a phone cannot last for 5 years, for those who refuse the buy-new - throw away cycle.
Note 4. I got a new Note last year and it runs just fine. There are tons of NIB, cheap Note 4 models.
It's time for me to move past the Samsung idea. LG V20, here I come. Maybe V30.
Note 4. I got a new Note last year and it runs just fine. There are tons of NIB, cheap Note 4 models.
It's time for me to move past the Samsung idea. LG V20, here I come. Maybe V30.
Every heard of ZeroLemon? they provide replacement batteries, an alternative to OEM. Mugen and others also.
Ever heard of concept of having a backup battery? I wouldn't send anything anywhere, but wait for an upgraded battery to arrive while using an aftermarket one.
Galaxy 7, that was an expensive lesson.
No removable battery = no go.
Apparently not learned the lessons of Galaxy 7.
Plus the fact that newer batteries have longer charge cycles than before. We're still stuck in the 2010 thinking that batteties have like 500 cycles before deteriorating, when batteries with 60,000 cycles before deteriorating lifespans have been existent since last year. Heck there's already an existing battery with 200,000 cycles. Obviously these aren't the ones in our phones though.This , again. It's a waste of a thread. Samsung, in addition to a large majority of manufacturers, moved away from removable batteries and it doesn't appear that they're looking back. There's no need to express your displeasure in this known fact on a new thread when plenty of other threads already exist debating this same topic. And it always boils down to "I'll just keep my Note 4," which is certainly your prerogative. But I think the updated software enhancements that come with the upgrades outweigh the need to swap batteries.
Honestly, I think there is a better chance of Samsung running iOS