Michael Alan Goff
Well-known member
- Apr 27, 2011
- 200
- 6
- 0
I believe the subject is "why so few tablet specific apps", which is what I was addressing (or at least stating my feelings on). In my not usually very humble opinion, the browsers and flash help address that department; not to mention that being one of the key advantages of the Android platform.
I won't argue that there may be advantages to tablet-specific apps, but isn't one of the goals of ICS to help unify the platform and reduce fragmentation? To me, that would suggest a reduction of focus on targeted apps.
Give me an idea of what you feel defines a tablet specific app. The screen size? Do we then have "10 inch" and "7 inch" specific apps? Is it the processor or memory? That's going to end up being a wide-spread variation of options. Is it a particular set of functionality? Again, tell me what functionality sets apart a tablet app from a smartphone app (aside from the obvious phone features).
The only reason I brought up the iPad was to answer a specific statement by another forum member. If you feel it makes me look like a "fanboy" to address someone else's thoughts, so be it; but please check the topic and discussions before suggesting someone is off them.
The thing that defines a tablet app, against a non-tablet, is the use of the screen. When an application os made for a smartphone, they're made to deal with specific issues. A screen the size of 4.5 inches or smaller requires certain things. The Gmail application is a good example on how to use the different size.
It actually makes use of the increased screen size.
As for why I called you a fanboy, it wasn't about bringing up you bringing up the iPad. I was bringing up your idea that "flash makes up for everything" as well as the antagonistic stance that you seem to have against the iPad itself. They're both tools, not religions.