Jonneh
Well-known member
- Aug 3, 2010
- 1,490
- 40
- 0
The deal on AT&T
It's "cool" to hate on AT&T right now, and has been for a year or more. Technically, it actually all started when the first iPhone became a phenomenon and grew so popular; AT&T didn't have enough network bandwidth to withstand all the new users - as we all know, iPhone was exclusive to AT&T, so if you wanted one, you needed that network. Since the release of the first iPhone, AT&T has worked hard on increasing their network capacity to accommodate the flush of iPhone users, and these days the problem is practically nonexistent, though people will still argue about that.
Recently, it has become cool, particularly here at Android Central, to kick and scream and shed tears of irate anger that AT&T began labeling its HSPA+ network as "4G", something T-Mobile has been doing for several years now, and no one has been b*tching at them for it. As intelligent, well-informed members of Android Central, we all should know that AT&T is in fact working on their LTE 4G, and they're still on their schedule of Summer 2011 (if I remember right). However, apparently we are not all well-informed members of Android Central, because recently it has also become cool to shout nonsense such as "AT&T isn't even working on 4G LAWLZ!".
As I stated in a comment in some lost main-page-article, AT&T has two big projects going on right now. Before they deploy LTE 4G, they first have to switch their entire infrastructure from layer-1 to layer-2. It, of course, is incredibly more complicated than how I just made it sound, but the fact remains that AT&T will have 4G just as the other carriers, and it's ridiculous to think they won't. This is their main project at the moment and the deadline for it is sometime in April if I remember right. If someone wants confirmation on that, I can ask my father, as he's the project manager of it. Only after this first project is completed can they deploy their LTE 4G.
In the meantime, AT&T is going to call their HSPA+ network 4G just like T-Mobile does, until they get their LTE 4G out later on, and it shouldn't be a big deal to anyone.
With all that out of the way, how any carrier is in your area of residence is completely situational. Maybe AT&T is great where I live, in GA, but sucks out in CA, on the complete opposite side of the U.S. Who knows - I don't.
However, I will say this: If you are not currently an AT&T customer, it is somewhat difficult to recommend you making the switch over to their network, simply because of the new-ish data caps. If you're like me, and have been grandfathered over to where you can keep your unlimited data for $30, and AT&T is good in your area, then you're set...get yourself an Atrix! It's what I plan to do. Goodbye RIM and Mike Lazardiggity-whatever.
It's "cool" to hate on AT&T right now, and has been for a year or more. Technically, it actually all started when the first iPhone became a phenomenon and grew so popular; AT&T didn't have enough network bandwidth to withstand all the new users - as we all know, iPhone was exclusive to AT&T, so if you wanted one, you needed that network. Since the release of the first iPhone, AT&T has worked hard on increasing their network capacity to accommodate the flush of iPhone users, and these days the problem is practically nonexistent, though people will still argue about that.
Recently, it has become cool, particularly here at Android Central, to kick and scream and shed tears of irate anger that AT&T began labeling its HSPA+ network as "4G", something T-Mobile has been doing for several years now, and no one has been b*tching at them for it. As intelligent, well-informed members of Android Central, we all should know that AT&T is in fact working on their LTE 4G, and they're still on their schedule of Summer 2011 (if I remember right). However, apparently we are not all well-informed members of Android Central, because recently it has also become cool to shout nonsense such as "AT&T isn't even working on 4G LAWLZ!".
As I stated in a comment in some lost main-page-article, AT&T has two big projects going on right now. Before they deploy LTE 4G, they first have to switch their entire infrastructure from layer-1 to layer-2. It, of course, is incredibly more complicated than how I just made it sound, but the fact remains that AT&T will have 4G just as the other carriers, and it's ridiculous to think they won't. This is their main project at the moment and the deadline for it is sometime in April if I remember right. If someone wants confirmation on that, I can ask my father, as he's the project manager of it. Only after this first project is completed can they deploy their LTE 4G.
In the meantime, AT&T is going to call their HSPA+ network 4G just like T-Mobile does, until they get their LTE 4G out later on, and it shouldn't be a big deal to anyone.
With all that out of the way, how any carrier is in your area of residence is completely situational. Maybe AT&T is great where I live, in GA, but sucks out in CA, on the complete opposite side of the U.S. Who knows - I don't.
However, I will say this: If you are not currently an AT&T customer, it is somewhat difficult to recommend you making the switch over to their network, simply because of the new-ish data caps. If you're like me, and have been grandfathered over to where you can keep your unlimited data for $30, and AT&T is good in your area, then you're set...get yourself an Atrix! It's what I plan to do. Goodbye RIM and Mike Lazardiggity-whatever.
