natehoy
Well-known member
- Sep 2, 2011
- 2,667
- 71
- 0
And if they manage to provide 4000mA of battery and 2 days of battery life then I don't think the removable back is that much necessary.
If "2 days of battery life" meant 18+ hours of screen-on time and 48+ hours of on-time, and the battery technology was a Lithium compound that was known for high numbers of recharges and tolerance of abuse (LIFEPO4, or similar), then I might consider a non-removable battery with the security of knowing that even after two years, the battery should still have 50% of capacity left and therefore I'd still be rocking it for a solid day without worries.
I don't see a device coming out in the next year that has that sort of revolutionary change in battery consumption. 4000mAh is only 25% more than the current Note 4. With my usage, that means I'd be starting out with a days' use, at most, without having to charge mid-day. After a year of the kind of abuse I put on batteries, especially the ones used in phones which tend not to be abuse-tolerant, I'd have a doorstop by 3PM.