What I found funny about the press conference video was how each phone was tested with appeared to be full bars, and later, Steve clarified how this test was done in a low recpetion area. Really? Is that why the all had full bars? Because they were in a low reception area?
I had an arguement with some dumb blonde chick that works at AT&T and is a total Apple drone, not just an iphone drone. She was going on and on how Steve made it all right, and after all, "it's apple, they are the best, no matter what". I mentioned what I just said about all the test phones having full bars in a low reception area and she had nothing to say to that. Then she was ripping Sprint, how they are losing money and going down the tubes and how they are the last place carrier....
If that would have been a guy, I would have *****slapped him a couple of times....I was so pissed by all that blind Apple love/stupidity.
Good point that it was on Apple's campus. They probably had some guy back stage, "When I touch the phone here, you throw that level to make the signal drop." Genius
---dcross9818
I love technobuffalo, the guy is usually fair and non fanboyish and he is an iphone user which is surprising. That video was great and highlighted how crappy apple antenna designs really are. With that said, the better indicaton of true signal quality is a decibel test showing the actual degradation in numbers. The iphone 4 was said to have a 19-20 decibel drop which was more than every other phone tested. And these numbers were obtained from 2 different sources. I'm curious to know how the 3gs and samsung vibrant will do on that test.
Signal bars are tied to decibel levels. They are literally the visual representation of the decibel reading. AT&T's handset makers all use the same formula (which apple just updated to use), so the drop in bars between the iP4 and the 9700 would be exactly the same.
It's quite pathetic for Steve Jobs to attack other companies when his real focus should've been on ways to handle the iPhone 4 crisis.