The latest Apple suit over the search patent brings up a question in my mind. I'm not an attorney so it may be viewed as a dumb question.
In their defense, can Samsung argue the validity of the patent since the search technology in question existed prior to the patent? I am trying to think of a way around our (U.S.) stupid patent laws.
In their defense, can Samsung argue the validity of the patent since the search technology in question existed prior to the patent? I am trying to think of a way around our (U.S.) stupid patent laws.