Build quality is great for me. # is funny to me that people have issues with Samsung's build quality of their devices, and love HTC and Motorola. But I have never had an issue with any Samsung phone I have ever owned. But the HTC phones I have had suffered from light leakage, dust under the screen, and dead pixels. My Motorola phones have been creaky and also suffered from dead pixels on the screen. My Note 2 is perfect. No issues.
from my Galaxy Note 2, baddest phone on the planet.
I think many use "build quality" and "build materials" interchangably and shouldn't.
Samsung phones have really good "build quality" but they don't use premium build materials.
The quality of design, construction, and assembly are excellent. Seams are tight and properly aligned, screens rarely have dead pixels, and phones last a long time.
The build materials of Samsung Flagship phones are not elite.
The iPhone uses solid glass and alluminum. The RAZR HD line uses alluminum, glass, and kevlar.
The DNA uses premium materials as well so it leaves the Samsung Flagship Galaxy S (and Note) line looking cheap.
I don't carry a naked phone because all phones with a 4" or greater screen are fragile and will break if they fall on a hard surface at the right angle. Therefore, build materials are not a huge factor for me in choosing a device. I loved the look and feel of the RAZR MAXX HD but what does it matter if I'm going to put it in a case anyway.
The "build quality" of the RAZR MAXX HD has been called into question by owners (misaligned seams, light leaks, etc) even with the high end materials.
The Galaxy Note 2 has high build quality and the plastic material won't really come into play under a nice case.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Android Central Forums