Verizon GN Delay Because of Connectivity?
- Thread starter Ewing33855
- Start date
Re: Say it ain't so! :-(
I would suspect that the Nexus bound for Verizon has quite a few units already rolled off the production line, boxed and ready to go.
The idea that it hasn't been thoroughly tested on the Verizon network this close to the Samsung/Google premier seems pretty far fetched.
I would suspect that the Nexus bound for Verizon has quite a few units already rolled off the production line, boxed and ready to go.
The idea that it hasn't been thoroughly tested on the Verizon network this close to the Samsung/Google premier seems pretty far fetched.
Re: Say it ain't so! :-(
They probably don't want another nexus one fiasco where they announced they were getting it, appeared on the nexus website, then pulled the plug. No official announcement until things are set in stone.
They probably don't want another nexus one fiasco where they announced they were getting it, appeared on the nexus website, then pulled the plug. No official announcement until things are set in stone.
Re: Say it ain't so! :-(
Damn I kind of agree with this! The announcement was pushed back a week for god knows what reason! How do you announce a phone with no carriers?? smh
Damn I kind of agree with this! The announcement was pushed back a week for god knows what reason! How do you announce a phone with no carriers?? smh
JoJoCal19
Well-known member
- Apr 9, 2011
- 225
- 11
- 0
JoJoCal19
Well-known member
- Apr 9, 2011
- 225
- 11
- 0
Re: Say it ain't so! :-(
I have heard nothing about what LTE chip is in the Nexus. Motorola pointed out that the RAZR has a new LTE chip that uses less battery and allows faster speeds.
Samsung wouldn't put the older, inferior LTE chip in the Nexus if there is a better chip available would they? Would they?
I have heard nothing about what LTE chip is in the Nexus. Motorola pointed out that the RAZR has a new LTE chip that uses less battery and allows faster speeds.
Samsung wouldn't put the older, inferior LTE chip in the Nexus if there is a better chip available would they? Would they?
Re: Say it ain't so! :-(
Roll Tide!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Damn we just gave it to you guys. And then a loss to Auburn, holy crap how low can you go?
Roll Tide!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Damn we just gave it to you guys. And then a loss to Auburn, holy crap how low can you go?
Re: Say it ain't so! :-(
no, clearly they would not do that...................just like they did with the CPU and GPU!!!!!!!
im not hatin either, i am completely content with specs, just sayin!!
no, clearly they would not do that...................just like they did with the CPU and GPU!!!!!!!
im not hatin either, i am completely content with specs, just sayin!!
Stang68
Well-known member
- Mar 15, 2010
- 2,270
- 99
- 0
I agree that they probably wouldnt have announced it and the release wouldnt be projected in their system (which I know can obviously change) had it experienced bad results...it just doesnt seem logical.
November 10th (if that is the solid, real date) is still a decent amount away, Im not too worried about a delay. Most importantly I just dont want one, and need a GN soon
November 10th (if that is the solid, real date) is still a decent amount away, Im not too worried about a delay. Most importantly I just dont want one, and need a GN soon
Re: Say it ain't so! :-(
Nonsense. Motorola's solution is homegrown, and the same as the one in the Bionic. There's no way Samsung could use it, and there's no way they would have anything else ready in time for launch.
These rumors are just that, RUMORS. There is not a chance in hell that Verizon waited until the last minute to get these devices into the hands of testers, and then told Samsung to fix it at the last minute and delay the phone. That just isn't how these things work.
Here's why we haven't heard a peep about this: The Galaxy Nexus is the first Nexus device offered on Verizon, and the first LTE Nexus device. It is a big deal, for Google, Samsung, and Verizon. Instead of spoiling that significance on the ICS presser (where the Nexus played second-fiddle to the new OS), Verizon wants to announce its version of the GNex on its own terms and in its own venue. We'll see it soon enough. My advice to all of you is this: Calm down, go outside, and enjoy the sunshine before Winter gets here.
Nonsense. Motorola's solution is homegrown, and the same as the one in the Bionic. There's no way Samsung could use it, and there's no way they would have anything else ready in time for launch.
These rumors are just that, RUMORS. There is not a chance in hell that Verizon waited until the last minute to get these devices into the hands of testers, and then told Samsung to fix it at the last minute and delay the phone. That just isn't how these things work.
Here's why we haven't heard a peep about this: The Galaxy Nexus is the first Nexus device offered on Verizon, and the first LTE Nexus device. It is a big deal, for Google, Samsung, and Verizon. Instead of spoiling that significance on the ICS presser (where the Nexus played second-fiddle to the new OS), Verizon wants to announce its version of the GNex on its own terms and in its own venue. We'll see it soon enough. My advice to all of you is this: Calm down, go outside, and enjoy the sunshine before Winter gets here.
I find it hard to believe that Sammy is having connectivity problems so bad it is allowing vzw to rethink its release. Lets not forget Samsung has lte experience with the Droid Charge. It can't be THAT bad... I'm sure its fixable if that's even the problem to begin with.
Sent from my DROID using Tapatalk
Sent from my DROID using Tapatalk
whiteshadow001
Well-known member
- Nov 29, 2010
- 1,232
- 46
- 0
Similar threads
Trending Posts
-
Forcefully removed from Magenta Max to Go5G Plus- Started by SyCoREAPER
- Replies: 6
-
-
-
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram