Over a year ago, as my company was decommissioning all of their Blackberry devices, they gave me the option to replace my Blackberry with any Android phone (or iPhone) I wanted. I chose the Moto X, which my company services through AT&T. I liked that phone so much that I ended up buying my own Moto X to replace my Razr Maxx, which I of course had on Verizon.
So for over a year now, I've had two basically identical Moto X phones; however, thanks to the Touchdown app, I got all of my company emails on my personal VZW phone and so the ATT phone spent most of its life sitting on my bedstand. I left it off the charger and only charged it every few days when it needed it (yes, the Moto X lasts a long time when you're not using it ). My VZW "daily driver" was recharged at least daily.
It always *seemed* like the ATT phone got better battery life than the VZW phone--even for the few weeks that I was carrying both around and using them roughly equally. I know I've been able to get >3 days from the ATT phone on standby, and I've never come close to that on my VZW phone on light usage days. However, now that I've upgraded to a Droid Turbo (because I got tired of crappy battery life), the VZW phone gets to sit with the ATT phone also being unused. So now that I have a level playing field, I decided to do an informal test and just let them sit until one of them gave me a battery warning. Here's what I got (ATT on left, VZW on right):
After 1d 12h, my VZW phone went from charged to 1% with no usage, and the ATT phone was still at 62% . Granted, the VZW phone was my daily driver and has seen a lot more use--and it has a few more apps installed--but I'm still surprised to see this much of a difference. Is this just what battery wear looks like after a year of ownership? Or does the VZW network just naturally drain more?
(The answer to my question *might* be in the pic--as you can see, Wifi was on for the VZW phone and not the ATT phone. But I've never seen Wifi be THAT much of a drain on battery life.)
So for over a year now, I've had two basically identical Moto X phones; however, thanks to the Touchdown app, I got all of my company emails on my personal VZW phone and so the ATT phone spent most of its life sitting on my bedstand. I left it off the charger and only charged it every few days when it needed it (yes, the Moto X lasts a long time when you're not using it ). My VZW "daily driver" was recharged at least daily.
It always *seemed* like the ATT phone got better battery life than the VZW phone--even for the few weeks that I was carrying both around and using them roughly equally. I know I've been able to get >3 days from the ATT phone on standby, and I've never come close to that on my VZW phone on light usage days. However, now that I've upgraded to a Droid Turbo (because I got tired of crappy battery life), the VZW phone gets to sit with the ATT phone also being unused. So now that I have a level playing field, I decided to do an informal test and just let them sit until one of them gave me a battery warning. Here's what I got (ATT on left, VZW on right):
After 1d 12h, my VZW phone went from charged to 1% with no usage, and the ATT phone was still at 62% . Granted, the VZW phone was my daily driver and has seen a lot more use--and it has a few more apps installed--but I'm still surprised to see this much of a difference. Is this just what battery wear looks like after a year of ownership? Or does the VZW network just naturally drain more?
(The answer to my question *might* be in the pic--as you can see, Wifi was on for the VZW phone and not the ATT phone. But I've never seen Wifi be THAT much of a drain on battery life.)