Hardware Hands-On

Love Divine

Well-known member
Apr 24, 2011
500
36
0
Visit site
Seems slightly underwhelming, but that was a given with all the speculation. It's a good looking device, but the screen is the big mark against it. Why no SAMOLED HD+? If I don't get US info soon it's EVO LTE for me.
 

MrSlippery519

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2011
394
6
0
Visit site
I like the battery size, I like the SD slot....the screen is good but nothing special. Overall looks like a great phone however am leaning towards to One X at the moment.
 

Kevin OQuinn

AC Team Emeritus
May 17, 2010
9,267
496
0
Visit site
Two things stick out to me. First, the menu button. That's going to hold Android back as a whole IMHO. Second, removable storage. Yes, it's a desired feature, but it's also something Android is moving away from. I would've like to see Samsung include a large amount of internal storage instead (and HTC, for that matter).

It's rounded, but it's still plastic. I was really hoping Samsung would wow us with something incredible.
 

bas.androiddev

Well-known member
Nov 10, 2011
106
6
0
Visit site
US version not expected till summer, and I still don't know if my carrier (Sprint) will offer it. That makes my decision easy - EVO 4g LTE for me. My og Evo 4g is showing it's age.
 

MrSlippery519

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2011
394
6
0
Visit site
US version not expected till summer, and I still don't know if my carrier (Sprint) will offer it. That makes my decision easy - EVO 4g LTE for me. My og Evo 4g is showing it's age.

That is my thought as well going with the One X...I am ready to upgrade anytime and would have been willing to wait a month or so if this phone was going to be something amazing however at best it's on par with the One X (and EVO 4g LTE) some aspects slightly better and some slightly worse.

Add in we will not see the phone until July or August it's a no brainer for me.
 

JayWill

Well-known member
Jun 21, 2011
2,631
571
0
Visit site
Not totally unexpected, and not as revolutionary as some were hoping. Honestly, I was keeping my expectations low because I wasn't overly expecting anything ground breaking out of this announcement.

Alex says "we don?t think anyone will be disappointed with the display tech Samsung?s brought to bear on the S III.", but while I obviously haven't seen the screen, I'm a bit disappointed that we didn't see SAMOLED HD PLUS in this screen. While I think the screen on the Galaxy Nexus does look nice (and according to Alex this screen might look a tad better), my eyes are pretty sensitive to the Pentile matrix, and it would bug me after awhile. The screen alone will probably be the sole factor from keeping me from upgrading from the GSII early, depending on how the US variants turn out.

Other thoughts ...

I bet the single button is not included in the US variants. Maybe a 3 capacitive button layout like the One X.

I'm a fan of expandable storage and a removable battery, and I'm glad they stuck with it. However, I agree with Kevin to an extent. I'd be perfectly happy with 32 to 64 GB non-removable internal memory. I do hope Android manufacturers get there eventually.

The design looks sleek and nice to the eye, but nothing drastic over the GSII. More subtle and refined in comparison I'd say.

Final thoughts ...

This will be a successful device, but I don't see it being a big pull on existing GSII owners. Depending on how the individual US carrier variants play out, I will probably be sticking with my Epic 4G Touch into 2013.
 

MOTH477

Well-known member
Jan 13, 2011
142
4
0
Visit site
Two things stick out to me. First, the menu button. That's going to hold Android back as a whole IMHO. Second, removable storage. Yes, it's a desired feature, but it's also something Android is moving away from. I would've like to see Samsung include a large amount of internal storage instead (and HTC, for that matter).

It's rounded, but it's still plastic. I was really hoping Samsung would wow us with something incredible.

I agree the S3 is underwhelming. MicroSD is important to most so I appreciate Samsung for leaving it there. There is only so much you can do with cloud storage and how much storage can they put in there to make it enough?
 

P_M_G

Well-known member
Oct 20, 2010
86
11
0
Visit site
makes me wonder why HTC didn't go for removeable battery in the E4GLTE. I think tho, that i'm still sticking with HTC. I really wanted the GS3 to be the one to get me to switch, but I guess i'm not far from a charger for very long most of the time so I'll risk it.
 

LazrRocketArm

Well-known member
Sep 12, 2011
796
64
0
Visit site
Two things stick out to me. First, the menu button. That's going to hold Android back as a whole IMHO. Second, removable storage. Yes, it's a desired feature, but it's also something Android is moving away from. I would've like to see Samsung include a large amount of internal storage instead (and HTC, for that matter).

It's rounded, but it's still plastic. I was really hoping Samsung would wow us with something incredible.

Cloud storage and streaming are great, but factor in data charges AND what about needing coverage?
Not too happy about paying for data(or throttling) for files I OWN!
 

frozndevl

Active member
Jun 16, 2010
30
3
0
Visit site
makes me wonder why HTC didn't go for removeable battery in the E4GLTE. I think tho, that i'm still sticking with HTC. I really wanted the GS3 to be the one to get me to switch, but I guess i'm not far from a charger for very long most of the time so I'll risk it.
I think with the unibody construction there isn't a user friendly way to make it removable, so they made it built-in.
 

ab304945

Well-known member
Dec 20, 2010
1,593
54
0
Visit site
I agree the S3 is underwhelming. MicroSD is important to most so I appreciate Samsung for leaving it there. There is only so much you can do with cloud storage and how much storage can they put in there to make it enough?

It is only underwhelming because ask the over hyping
 

PewterL31

Well-known member
Nov 24, 2011
118
6
0
Visit site
They are offering 3 models 16bg, 32gb and 64gb with sd slot so that should make both camps happy. i am looking forward to upgrading to this from my skyrocket.
 

newbey123

Well-known member
Apr 21, 2012
45
2
0
Visit site
Wow. Now I am glad that I went with my guy and ordered the One X. The S3 will be a very nice phone for those that were needing the extra storage.

However, the One X seems to be a better total package. Glad I didn't cancel it. At least I can stop debating if I made the right decision.
 

Prozak

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2010
185
28
0
Visit site
I'm most likely in the minority here, but I hope the US keeps the physical button. My phone doubles as toddler entertainment on car rides and while I like the capacitive buttons on my DINC2, my toddler finds a way to hit the home button every 30 seconds and I get a "Daddy, it turned off by itself.. HELP!". So, typically, we have to use the wife's iphone for that as she knows not to press the button.

Would be win-win for me, except I have unlimited data, she doesn't. Pretty dumb reason to be excited over a button.... But, at least for me, is a damn good feature
 

unashamedgeek

Well-known member
Sep 27, 2011
357
4
0
Visit site
I'm also hoping to keep the physical button. I think it makes sense when using that to turn on the screen, followed by using your thumb to unlock the device.
 

Tkbredx

Well-known member
Apr 8, 2012
2,101
58
0
Visit site
Things about the hardware I love:
-The build of the device, its sexy.
-Removable battery
-SD slot

Things about the hardware I hate:
-No black version -___-
-The buttons. Bring on the modern 3 soft touch. I feel outdated
-No camera button (not that big of a deal though)
-Screen,No SAMOLED HD+. The average user like myself doesnt really see the difference but I know its not the best out there so it makes me mad. lol
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
943,170
Messages
6,917,628
Members
3,158,860
Latest member
smokedog87