rrballer11
Well-known member
- Mar 5, 2014
- 335
- 0
- 0
Watches have those because they need very little power. With a phone, if the entire back was a solar panel, it would take at least a day of not being used to charge it up.I wonder whether it's possible to view power demand/management from a different perspective?
Why not create a device that has a solar panel beneath the display (like some watches have), or on the reverse that can keep the battery topped up continually? I'd favour this over a bigger phone needed to hold a bigger battery...
I don't get the whole argument in phones lasting days on a single charge.
With 2k screens becoming the norm I do believe a 4000mah battery would suffice.
This would get any heavy user through a whole day, then charge when asleep, wake up and your good to go again.
Why is it an issue to some to charge while sleeping?
Posted via Android Central App
Why not create a device that has a solar panel beneath the display (like some watches have), or on the reverse that can keep the battery topped up continually? I'd favour this over a bigger phone needed to hold a bigger battery...
I don't get the whole argument in phones lasting days on a single charge.
With 2k screens becoming the norm I do believe a 4000mah battery would suffice.
This would get any heavy user through a whole day, then charge when asleep, wake up and your good to go again.
Why is it an issue to some to charge while sleeping?
Posted via Android Central App
4000 mah cell will not get you through the whole day on a 2K phone. It doesn't do it on a HD phone today.
3,000 mah cell in G3 is completely inadequate.
Whilst I know what you mean, the argument is a little bit like saying car fuel tanks only need to be big enough to last the majority of people's average daily mileage. The car can be topped up on the way home - after all why carry the extra fuel around which decreases the efficiency of the car?
.