- Feb 13, 2011
- 286
- 6
- 0
Anyone having a major issue with Sprint (or any carrier if still applies) honoring the $200 trade-in deal while under 2-year contracts? I had a major battle with them today after they didn't honor what they said about it to me a few days ago. I was told that it was absolutely no problem and I was eligible and confirmed and repeated it multiple times (on other phone calls to other locations to check stock too) that it'd work.
Finally track down a 64gb today at another corporate location since the one I usually go to hasn't had them when I call and I go in and they give me some BS about it being for the lease option and whatever options only. I say okay but and explained to the lady and her managr how ridiculous it was that I've gotten misinformation (or worse, lies) from people working at three corporate stores and how it's absolute nonsense and how they're basically a criminal syndicate at this point and blah blah.
Spent 1.5 hours on a phone call with Sprint and explained to them my story in detail (including the lies and BS from them going back to last year, actually) and the guy I was speaking to said he had no authority but wrote everything up and attached it to my account and told me to go back into the original store where I was told I'd be okay with a 2 year plan upgrade. I mean I went in days before the phone came out just to verify the details for sure and I even ordered accessories on Amazon. Why would I do that if I had any doubts about the 2 year thing working? Still have texts from my GF from that date as well where I explained to her what the Sprint guy said about being allowed to do it with the 2 year.
Have others ran into issues like this? It's asinine to me how supposed corporate stores could say such things that, apparently, aren't factual at all. I should have gotten it in writing. I'm never doing anything with these guys without getting it in writing ever again. And it's bogus too since the $200 trade-in thing seems to be with everyone, not just Sprint. What a fiasco.
Frustrating as hell. All I want is to get the phone that I was told I'd be able to get no problem. If I was told it didn't apply to me, sure, fine, I'd just opt for the 32gb (they had plenty of those last friday) and do the $250 upgrade. But if I was told I could get the 64gb for $150 after the trade-in, why *WOULDN'T* I have done that?
Finally track down a 64gb today at another corporate location since the one I usually go to hasn't had them when I call and I go in and they give me some BS about it being for the lease option and whatever options only. I say okay but and explained to the lady and her managr how ridiculous it was that I've gotten misinformation (or worse, lies) from people working at three corporate stores and how it's absolute nonsense and how they're basically a criminal syndicate at this point and blah blah.
Spent 1.5 hours on a phone call with Sprint and explained to them my story in detail (including the lies and BS from them going back to last year, actually) and the guy I was speaking to said he had no authority but wrote everything up and attached it to my account and told me to go back into the original store where I was told I'd be okay with a 2 year plan upgrade. I mean I went in days before the phone came out just to verify the details for sure and I even ordered accessories on Amazon. Why would I do that if I had any doubts about the 2 year thing working? Still have texts from my GF from that date as well where I explained to her what the Sprint guy said about being allowed to do it with the 2 year.
Have others ran into issues like this? It's asinine to me how supposed corporate stores could say such things that, apparently, aren't factual at all. I should have gotten it in writing. I'm never doing anything with these guys without getting it in writing ever again. And it's bogus too since the $200 trade-in thing seems to be with everyone, not just Sprint. What a fiasco.
Frustrating as hell. All I want is to get the phone that I was told I'd be able to get no problem. If I was told it didn't apply to me, sure, fine, I'd just opt for the 32gb (they had plenty of those last friday) and do the $250 upgrade. But if I was told I could get the 64gb for $150 after the trade-in, why *WOULDN'T* I have done that?