I know it's making me wonder, when you can get the Atrix for 130. Yeah I know they're not comparable in some ways, AT&T sucks, etc. But 300 is a chunk of change for hardware that most people recognize will be dated fast.
Remember, what you're buying is a mini-computer. Computers date fast too, but people shell out for them. So, what's the difference? It's kinda like your car depreciating in value the minute you drive it off the lot.
My big question is what will the Droid Bionic cost and when will it be released in relation to the TBolt. I've waited longer than I wanted to already and I hate my BB, but for $300 I'll probably wait at least a week until after the release to see how the TBolt actually performs and weight that against other phones.
Remember, what you're buying is a mini-computer. Computers date fast too, but people shell out for them. So, what's the difference? It's kinda like your car depreciating in value the minute you drive it off the lot.
I'd pay $400.00 but not any more; not because of budgeting concerns, but because of bang for the buck.
If $50.00 makes people alter their budgets, they don't need this smartphone. Actually, nobody "needs" a smart phone, they're just fun. Don't get mad, I'm just being real and any accountant would tell you the same thing.
I'd say the analogy is off, that's the difference. Something like the Atrix is cheaper, relatively more future-proof, depending on when dual-core support is being launched. It'll be sometime in the 2-year contract window though, no doubt. Probably in 2011. So the point isn't whether it depreciates on its own, but whether it depreciates relatively. The value of a Honda holds up better as compared to, say, a Chevy. Not to mention if the Thunderbolt has the same battery as the Inspire, we're in a lot of trouble.
While I agree if there isn't $50 in your budget to spare, a several hundred dollar phone shouldn't be on your shopping list. But that isn't what we're arguing. Its the 20% increase on what we thought. That's a huge jump. Especially when the advertised price last week was 249..not sourced from a rumorI'd pay $400.00 but not any more; not because of budgeting concerns, but because of bang for the buck.
If $50.00 makes people alter their budgets, they don't need this smartphone. Actually, nobody "needs" a smart phone, they're just fun. Don't get mad, I'm just being real and any accountant would tell you the same thing.
If $50.00 makes people alter their budgets, they don't need this smartphone. Actually, nobody "needs" a smart phone, they're just fun. Don't get mad, I'm just being real and any accountant would tell you the same thing.