- May 4, 2010
- 322
- 3
- 0
manhattan is barely covered on the map... kinda ticks me off that clear got the easy part done and not the hard parts...
Cheers if your in NJ, jeers if yours in NYC
Cheers if your in NJ, jeers if yours in NYC
lol... I'm in NJ (Newark area) and was surprised to get 4g in my home area. I didn't see much of a difference in performance.
What exactly is so impressive about 4g - other than the $10/mo fee? Please enlighten me.
That's not the map that tells what coverage is really there. Sensorly is the app you want to see the real coverage maps.manhattan is barely covered on the map... kinda ticks me off that clear got the easy part done and not the hard parts...
Cheers if your in NJ, jeers if yours in NYC
That's not the map that tells what coverage is really there. Sensorly is the app you want to see the real coverage maps.
jonathan
AFTER USING YOUR APP FOR SEVERAL MONTHS, I BEGAN TO NOTICE THAT MY SIGNAL STRENGTH IS SHOWING UP ALITTLE INACCURATE WHEREAS MY SIGNAL SHOWS FULL STRENGTH AND YOUR MAPS SHOWS 3/4. I'M ALITTLE CONCERN ABOUT BIAS. MY PHONE IS AN HTC EVO 4G ALSO THAT THE MAP OF VERIZON IS ALMOST COMPLETELY FULL COVERAGE AND SPRINT IS LESS THAN THAT. COULD YOU LOOK INTO THIS?
Reply
Hi Jonathan,
The signal index (3 out of 4) is computed slightly differently on the HTC EVO 4G than on other CDMA phones. That explains the discrepancy.
Philippe
jonathan
to Philippe
show details Nov 2 (2 days ago)
Could you explain to me the difference?
Also, thanks for the rapid reply
It's just that the raw value is mapped to a different number of bars.
Cheers
Philippe