- Dec 1, 2010
- 974
- 17
- 0
I'm definitely not happy, but I am hoping others can tell me why I am wrong and/or shouldn't be so concerned.
I tend to use the 3.5 mm audio jack the most when I am travelling. I like wired earbuds because they are cheap, compact, require no external power, and I won't be too upset if I lose them on a bus, train, or taxi cab.
I know that Moto will include an adapter, but I really don't want to worry about using one or risk putting any unnecessary stress on the USB-C port.
I know that wireless headphones are an option, but can somebody tell me typically how much they cost? I am guessing, under $5 is unrealistic. OK....let's say I can get a pair for $20-$25, how is battery life typically?
Is it realistic that I could get 100-200 hours of audio playback before having to replace the battery?
It's not that I am entirely opposed to change. Perhaps, by this time next year, 75% of phones will be without the 3.5 mm jack.
I thought I would miss replaceable batteries. Nope.
I prefer internal storage to removable storage--Granted my Nexus 6P has 128 GB
As someone who also experienced a little trepidation, moving from Micro USB to USB Type C, I have to say, and I think most will agree, USB Type C is a better connection. It plugs in easier and also seems more secure.
In total, I've maybe spent $30 on a few USB Type C cables and can't say that I miss Micro-USB.
So, tell me why I am a big baby and still feel the need to hang on to my 3.5 mm jack?
If the next Nexus has stereo speakers (without the need of an external mod) and a 3.5 mm audio jack, I'll definitely consider it before the Moto Z and I still love my Moto X Pure!!!
It'll be interesting if Apple decides to follow Moto's lead when it releases the Iphone 7. However, I am not expecting USB Type C headphones to become abundant, since Apple will probably use it's lightning port instead of USB C.
I tend to use the 3.5 mm audio jack the most when I am travelling. I like wired earbuds because they are cheap, compact, require no external power, and I won't be too upset if I lose them on a bus, train, or taxi cab.
I know that Moto will include an adapter, but I really don't want to worry about using one or risk putting any unnecessary stress on the USB-C port.
I know that wireless headphones are an option, but can somebody tell me typically how much they cost? I am guessing, under $5 is unrealistic. OK....let's say I can get a pair for $20-$25, how is battery life typically?
Is it realistic that I could get 100-200 hours of audio playback before having to replace the battery?
It's not that I am entirely opposed to change. Perhaps, by this time next year, 75% of phones will be without the 3.5 mm jack.
I thought I would miss replaceable batteries. Nope.
I prefer internal storage to removable storage--Granted my Nexus 6P has 128 GB
As someone who also experienced a little trepidation, moving from Micro USB to USB Type C, I have to say, and I think most will agree, USB Type C is a better connection. It plugs in easier and also seems more secure.
In total, I've maybe spent $30 on a few USB Type C cables and can't say that I miss Micro-USB.
So, tell me why I am a big baby and still feel the need to hang on to my 3.5 mm jack?
If the next Nexus has stereo speakers (without the need of an external mod) and a 3.5 mm audio jack, I'll definitely consider it before the Moto Z and I still love my Moto X Pure!!!
It'll be interesting if Apple decides to follow Moto's lead when it releases the Iphone 7. However, I am not expecting USB Type C headphones to become abundant, since Apple will probably use it's lightning port instead of USB C.