crackberrytraitor
Well-known member
- May 10, 2012
- 1,790
- 132
- 0
Not entirely accurate. It took a little bit of trickery just to get the iPhone to clock up to 1.2ghz (and they used Geekbench to determine it) because Apple is so aggressive with the gating.
Most powerful still comes down to which one has the fastest hardware (since that's the power). Testing strictly the hardware, and going based off strictly the hardware, the iPhone 5 has everything else beat. You're talking about what Apple talks about, which is what that does for the end user. Which is fine, because ultimately that's what matters.
The GPU in the IPhone 5 is fast. Really fast. The CPU is equivalent to the S4 (let's just assume for arguments sake). The GPU is the difference maker. And I'm not sure, but I would bet that Apple offloads a lot of the UI drawing to the GPU to save on power. Android can do this, too (I think CM has a hack that allows it on some devices/kernels), and it's supposed to make the UI smoother, save power, and leave the CPU for doing other types of things. This is where the S4 and Tegra 3 have a significant disadvantage. The GPU's aren't as fast as what Apple uses (the Mali in the Exynos is slower, too).
It just seems like we're talking about raw power, but you're talking about what the software does with it. I also wonder how Geekbench is coded and running its tests on each device. Different OS's, completely different coding languages. Safe bet they don't behave exactly the same because of that.
I would point out that there are almost GPU tests that have been run on the i5 that are not at least partially influenced by software. The output provided to the benchmarks used is based on the efficiency of the routing software rather than the hardware, GLbenchmark in particular. In the few tests of pure hardware, such as floating point calculations per second, the S4 beats the A6 hands down.
I'm honestly not just blindly defending Android. I've worked with CPUs for many years, all the way back to my Apple II with it's badass early CMOS chip. I used to defend Apple, back when PC clones were invading the market. I think that the A6 is a great improvement. But I am not at all convinced that the A6 is a superior piece of hardware, rather I think it is managed by particularly efficient, cut-down software.
And btw, Geekbench performs the same on any O.S. It measures the outputs in designated categories. A more efficient O.S. may give a higher score, but because it puts out a higher output from improved hardware management, not from a software variance in Geekbench from platform to platform.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Android Central Forums