Re: Apparently The HTC Sensation & EVO 3D Take Great Pics After a
Surfboard in pic is waxed just about up to nose which is very odd on short-boards.
Surfboard in pic is waxed just about up to nose which is very odd on short-boards.
Surfboard in pic is waxed just about up to nose which is very odd on short-boards.
In natural light the 3D takes good pictures, but with flash photography, I get a green tint on my pictures.
I think the problem for me is that sometimes adjusting the settings for each shot takes too much time and effort. Sometimes you just want to take a pic and run. (taking pictures from a car or if you need to capture something very quickly)
Ed
Umm, the reviewer seemed to focus on capabilities over quality, so yeah, the Evo 3d being to the only 3d phone would be on that list. For the record, the Evo 3d camera is not a terrible camera, but it would have been nicer if the Evo 3d would have been an Evo 4g2 and had a serious 8 mp, or higher, camera instead of the 3d gimic. However, some people do like the 3d aspect, so it seems to be a matter of taste.
It's not the mp that determines a good camera, rather its the lens quality. Look at the iPhone. Higher mp are better for viewing images on a large scale.
Umm, the reviewer seemed to focus on capabilities over quality, so yeah, the Evo 3d being to the only 3d phone would be on that list. For the record, the Evo 3d camera is not a terrible camera, but it would have been nicer if the Evo 3d would have been an Evo 4g2 and had a serious 8 mp, or higher, camera instead of the 3d gimic. However, some people do like the 3d aspect, so it seems to be a matter of taste.
Well, it is both; while I agree that there can be somewhat bad cameras with high resolutions, a great camera would have both quality and high resolution.
I do not understand. I was just trying to take some simple pictures of my dogs and the shutter lag was so long I was not able to get one good picture. The color is also way off in certain situations. This is by far the worst camera phone I have every had. I love the rest of the phone or I would take it back. I am so unhappy with the camera that I would use some explatives, but I don't want to get thrown out of the forums. I can't understand how you people can just down right lie about how good the camera is. I've heard of Apple fanboys. Is that what is happening here. Do you want your Android powered phone to be so good that you have to lie to yourselves!
It's not the mp that determines a good camera, rather its the lens quality. Look at the iPhone. Higher mp are better for viewing images on a large scale.
I agree. For me the 3d novelty has worn off. I just want a camera that is capable of taking a good picture.
I think a great camera is a camera that is capable of taking a great picture. IMO the 3d is only capable of taking a great picture in optimal conditions. The 4g definitely had a better camera.
some people can't see beyond the megapixel count. i had an old Sony camera from about a decade ago that was 1.2 megapixels and it took better pics than my new 10 megapixel camera. it's all about the optics.
I do not understand. I was just trying to take some simple pictures of my dogs and the shutter lag was so long I was not able to get one good picture. The color is also way off in certain situations. This is by far the worst camera phone I have every had. I love the rest of the phone or I would take it back. I am so unhappy with the camera that I would use some explatives, but I don't want to get thrown out of the forums. I can't understand how you people can just down right lie about how good the camera is. I've heard of Apple fanboys. Is that what is happening here. Do you want your Android powered phone to be so good that you have to lie to yourselves!