anon(9691750)
Well-known member
- Oct 20, 2015
- 135
- 0
- 0
This is always something I've never cared about... Why do you even care?
I'm not inclined to agree that it's paranoia. An app developer from another country may not be held to litigation from another one.Paranoia at its best... You think an app dev would open itself up to a class action law suit? Have you ever heard of anyone being taken advantage of by an app?
Plenty of app developers have tried in the past. Just do a Google search.Paranoia at its best... You think an app dev would open itself up to a class action law suit? Have you ever heard of anyone being taken advantage of by an app?
I thought you could pick and choose what permissions you want an app to have.
I'm not inclined to agree that it's paranoia. An app developer from another country may not be held to litigation from another one.
To illustrate a different point....let's take a flashlight app. And let's say that flashlight app has permission to the camera, phone identity, web access, contacts, read and modify USB storage, and keep device from sleeping. Don't these sound excessive?
Actually, the permissions choice started with Marshmallow because I've been taking advantage of that on my Note 4 since it got MM.Yes you can on all devices nougat or higher.
If you deny access to contacts, the app refuses to run. I could easily share saved pictures without the app having access to my contacts.The pen up permissions for Contacts is so you can share the picture you colored. If you don't think you'll be sharing any pictures I would think you can deny that one after it's installed (via application permissions).
Ignorance at its best. If course it has happened, and I experienced it personally. That's why I am more cautious now.Paranoia at its best... You think an app dev would open itself up to a class action law suit? Have you ever heard of anyone being taken advantage of by an app?
Yes you can on all devices nougat or higher.
Camera is the only one that makes sense other than web access, which is to serve ads.
I added phone identity so that the app gets overridden by an incoming phone call. I think that is a mandatory permission?
Sammy would really only be "responsible" for explaining the needs of various permissions for actual Samsung developed apps.Better question is... Does Samsung explain exactly how they're using each one?
Oh I thought we were talking about Samsung apps.Sammy would really only be "responsible" for explaining the needs of various permissions for actual Samsung developed apps.
Sammy has no authority over any app in the Play Store so it's up to each dev to accurately describe the reasons for each permission an app requests, and while I've seen a few apps explain rather clearly why they require certain permissions, those are definitely far, few, and in between.
What would be nice is if Google made that a requirement for devs to get their apps into the Play Store in the first place.
Haha...The OP was questioning a couple of Sammy apps but I think the conversation kind of morphed into more of a general question about permissions.Oh I thought we were talking about Samsung apps.
Haha...The OP was questioning a couple of Sammy apps but I think the conversation kind of morphed into more of a general question about permissions.
If you deny access to contacts, the app refuses to run. I could easily share saved pictures without the app having access to my contacts.
For Samsung Pay, I can understand the body sensors permission. Many permissions are lumped together, and fingerprints and body sensors are probably lumped together. SMS, Contacts, Storage and Camera.....I don't understand why those are required.