You talk about bias and then say "Then they go on saying how you can't add more storage to the iPad or change anything about it WTF it's a tablet not a bloody desktop". Lets disintegrate that.I seriously am disgusted by the bias by so many members on here, for example they think its funny if apple hires ex google maps employees.WTF!?!? How is that funny it's just business. Next all of them sayer iPhone is ,have they actually used an Apple product before? Then they go on saying how you can't add more storage to the iPad or change anything about it WTF it's a tablet not a bloody desktop.
[Moderator edit.]
/end rant.
Even cameras have expandable storage memory, laptops do too, plenty other smartphones and tablets do too, thus it's not solely desktops. Not to mention current technology allows to store 64GB in a paper thin device not larger than your finger nail, basically its an apple subjective restriction, because it barely takes any space. That, some people do not like, specially the ones that want to access their data, songs, movies, videos instantly, not having to wait for it to stream from the cloud and be SOL if they have no reception or dont want to use any more of their limited data and the file they want is not "cached". Its funny, those who say "cloud" is the next step in storage and bash sd cards or greater flash memory, without considering access times, latency and reliability.
When most people say "you can't change anything about it", they refer to the software side, not the hardware. That kind of closed mentality is what some people do not like about apple. People like to customize their stuff, its human nature, even you have your room in a specific way you like, your house, your car, your office. So yeah, in android, you can pretty much change nearly everything software related, thats why they say that. Again, its not bound to desktops only. You don't find it important to change the kernel, ROM, launcher, etc and have full control of the device? I can probably find several things that are not important to customize for me that are actually important for you to have them the way you want them, its about the person mainly.
Its not being biased, its... thinking.
They probably found apple hiring google maps employees funny because of how arrogant apple's advertising about apple maps was before they realized how bad their software was.
I don't understand the whole comparison of Ios to android. As far as I am concerned you have to do it on a device by device basis because....
Iphones cater to one crowd. People who buy flagship devices and want that sized screen. For someone who wants a bigger screen, there is no apple option. My point is, apple and android are very different, android is an all inclusive os on all different phones and devices. Apple is a niche market of 3 mobile devices at a time. 2 tablets and the iPhone. So comparing apple too android is like comparing a ford explorer to Chevrolet as a car company. The explorer (apple) could be perfectly good, but you can't compare that one thing to a whole manufacturer Chevrolet (android). That one SUV can't do everything that all of Chevys lineup van. Simple as that. Apple is simply different so comparing them is pointless unless you are doing it on a device by device basis.
Just my .02
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Android Central Forums
Both are operating systems (iOS and android), and its a fair comparison, hardware is an independent factor. Then by your same argument comparing windows and mac OS is not fair and should not be done, because windows is in thousands of models while mac OS is only in like 8 hardware models in a specific development timeline. Hardware is irrelevant in software comparison because both operating systems are adaptable. Android is android regardless of the device, sure, you get some "customization" across manufacturers, but the API and the entire operating system is still the same.
What is actually a niche market is the hardware, what you said, minus the android OS and iOS part. Apple hardware is a smaller market than all the android manufacturer's combined. The hardware caters a greater audience on android running devices than in iOS, and obviously you can't fairly compare a larger screen with a smaller one, unless you factor in consumer preferences.
Both companies are competing for the same market share, just because apple only makes 6 models running iOS does not make its devices non-comparable to other manufacturer's making more models running android. The same applies for windows and mac OS. You can compare on a software, hardware and package level, it all depends on what you want to show.
Last edited: