Phil, any ETA on your full review?
Yet another reason this is the #1 site for Andriod news and reviews. Most other sites posted their reviews after what seemed to be using the phone for 24 hours.Nope. I actually like to *use* the phone before writing a review.![]()
Nope. I actually like to *use* the phone before writing a review.![]()
When the Evo 4G came out it set the standard for Android phones - fast network, large screen, snappy performance. When I got mine on launch day this is what I expected, and in 12 months of use I haven't been displeased yet.
I've read every review so far of the Evo 3D and it would appear as though HTC may have dropped the ball just a bit. Other than better hardware and Sense 3.0 it doesn't seem that the Evo's successor does a worthy job upholding the legacy established by the original. This is a problem, IMO, and this is the question I hope Phil's final review answers.
Do u want it to fly u in space. I mean what else would u possibly want? Bigger battery? Done. Double the processing speed? Done. Double the memory? Done. Better Res? Done. New version of sense? Done. Gingerbread? Done. No lag? Done. What else would soomeone want is out of my capacity to think. If u want a phone to use as your camera then you really don't want a phone. 720p recording is still good for any phone. The wirefly video was pretty damn good for a phone.
I think this is the problem... "good enough" is so variable for different people. In this facebook posting world, I'd have to agree with you. From my photography background, I'd still almost agree with you because I'm not printing anything. Even if I did, what I do with my camera is snapshot memories... unlikely to go over 4x6.but it should be better than the standard point and shoot cameras on the market when you bought your last phone. Nobody says the next iPhone shouldn't be able to replace your main camera. Samsung, Nokia, and Sony cameras have been good enough to replace your main camera for years.
I think this is the problem... "good enough" is so variable for different people. In this facebook posting world, I'd have to agree with you. From my photography background, I'd still almost agree with you because I'm not printing anything. Even if I did, what I do with my camera is snapshot memories... unlikely to go over 4x6.
But, expect it to be better than a mid range point and shoot? I'm sorry, but physics wins this one. Until software gets better, it's not going to happen. This is, however, a pure technical issue. So yes, for what most ppl tend to do with their point and shoots, it should be expected the phones of today can take that job.