Cell phone radiation?

[zipro]

Scared or not: at least Samsung has had an excellent track record producing low-radiaton phones. Apple, with the exception of the new iPhone X, has always been through the roof in this aspect. Even their airpods have a SAR of 0.45, which is already higher than the S9+, except that people have those things in their ears for hours every day

 

[Itsa_Me_Mario]

Scared or not: at least Samsung has had an excellent track record producing low-radiaton phones. Apple, with the exception of the new iPhone X, has always been through the roof in this aspect. Even their airpods have a SAR of 0.45, which is already higher than the S9+, except that people have those things in their ears for hours every day

Two things.

One, the electronic manufacturers report the MAXIMUM levels of SAR value, when phone is operating at it's highest power. According to cancer.org, "according to the FCC, comparing SAR values between phones can be misleading. The listed SAR value is based only on the phone operating at its highest power, not on what users would typically be exposed to with normal phone use. The actual SAR value during use varies based on a number of factors, so it’s possible that a phone with a lower listed SAR value might actually expose a person to more RF energy than one with a higher listed SAR value in some cases".

Two, RF waves produced by cell phones are not strong enough to damage DNA directly or to heat body tissues. That is the reason that researchers aren't even sure how cell phones COULD cause cancer, which is in accord with the preponderance of evidence that shows not only a lack of causal link between cell phone usage and any type of cancer, but a complete lack of correlation as well. The WHO has classified RF as "possibly carcinogenic to humans", however the important context that the RF waves on cell phones are not strong enough to do so means that when the WHO is referring to RF, they're clearly talking about mass exposure, not the extremely limited RF waves in our phones.

FDA: “The majority of studies published have failed to show an association between exposure to radiofrequency from a cell phone and health problems.”

FCC: “There is no scientific evidence that proves that wireless phone usage can lead to cancer or a variety of other problems, including headaches, dizziness or memory loss. However, organizations in the United States and overseas are sponsoring research and investigating claims of possible health effects related to the use of wireless telephones.”

CDC: “At this time we do not have the science to link health problems to cell phone use. Scientific studies are underway to determine whether cell phone use may cause health effects.”

NIEHS: “Current scientific evidence has not conclusively linked cell phone use with any adverse health problems, but more research is needed.”

NCI: “Studies thus far have not shown a consistent link between cell phone use and cancers of the brain, nerves, or other tissues of the head or neck. More research is needed because cell phone technology and how people use cell phones have been changing rapidly.”

Key theme = the fear mongering of the video creator's deliberate misinformation is entirely groundless. Experts continue to do research in order to try to keep up with changes in usage habits and changes in technology, etc, however the fact that such research exists is not the same thing as evidence of the opposite conclusion of all the research done to date.

The upper limit on SAR imposed by the FCC in the US is 1.6 W/kg of body weight. 0.45 is obviously less than 1/3 of the allowable limit, and the 0.45 represents the maximum SAR level of those airpods.

 

[L0n3N1nja]

Forgot I commented in this already haha.

 

[androidloveryes]

hi

i want to stay away from harmfull effect of emf.

can someone suggest me a list or models of cell phone that havea low sar?

not top new cause over priced but not to old so it works well. tx

I am in america but open tu buy a oriental phone.

 

[mustang7757]

Forgot I commented in this already haha.

Lol