Do Samsung phones slow down over time?

Status
Not open for further replies.
https://youtu.be/OPdh9tWFTFs

I can search YouTube as well! That is with a G6.

So by your standards... Why does LG make their phones lag?

I actually have an old LG Optimus Prime Fuel that I use every day for music streaming, it's 3 years old. Still works and no lag from updates (it's not a fast phone to begin with). We're also talking about hardware failure too. Why not just acknowledge the hardware gets slow over time and dies while other phones don't do that. The Italian government isn't investigating Samsung for fun, it's a serious issue.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-drawing-samsung-into-apples-battery-battles/

"AGCM said in a statement on its website that the inquiry was prompted by customer reports and its preliminary research. Both indicated that Apple and Samsung had exploited problems with their phones’ components to reduce their performance and encourage people to buy new devices, the agency said. AGCM did not specify which models it was looking into."
 
I actually have an old LG Optimus Prime Fuel that I use every day for music streaming, it's 3 years old. Still works and no lag from updates (it's not a fast phone to begin with). We're also talking about hardware failure too. Why not just acknowledge the hardware gets slow over time and dies while other phones don't do that. The Italian government isn't investigating Samsung for fun, it's a serious issue.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-drawing-samsung-into-apples-battery-battles/

"AGCM said in a statement on its website that the inquiry was prompted by customer reports and its preliminary research. Both indicated that Apple and Samsung had exploited problems with their phones’ components to reduce their performance and encourage people to buy new devices, the agency said. AGCM did not specify which models it was looking into."

You can pick n' choose what you want to share/believe. It could be something or absolutely nothing- We won't know until an actual report comes out. This story is vague & months old with no updates.

Its apparent you have a hatred for Samsung for one reason or another(which is fine - we all have preferences/opinions) but you don't want to hear when a majority of people who own their phones have no issues after updates but scream look, look, look when there are those that do. All phones have lag issues with age - mostly dependent on how they're used.
 
I actually have an old LG Optimus Prime Fuel that I use every day for music streaming, it's 3 years old. Still works and no lag from updates (it's not a fast phone to begin with). We're also talking about hardware failure too. Why not just acknowledge the hardware gets slow over time and dies while other phones don't do that. The Italian government isn't investigating Samsung for fun, it's a serious issue.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-drawing-samsung-into-apples-battery-battles/

"AGCM said in a statement on its website that the inquiry was prompted by customer reports and its preliminary research. Both indicated that Apple and Samsung had exploited problems with their phones’ components to reduce their performance and encourage people to buy new devices, the agency said. AGCM did not specify which models it was looking into."
And? We have users here who have used Samsung phones for years and still have them without lag... Yet you dismiss them.

Why should you having that old phone excuse the G6 video? By your own standards shouldn't the people here saying they have no issues with Samsung be enough if you saying your one LG phone doesn't have issues so that excuses LG?
 
And? We have users here who have used Samsung phones for years and still have them without lag... Yet you dismiss them.

Why should you having that old phone excuse the G6 video? By your own standards shouldn't the people here saying they have no issues with Samsung be enough if you saying your one LG phone doesn't have issues so that excuses LG?
Exactly. He dismissed personal accounts here from people saying their 3, 4, 5 year old Samsung are fine, and yet thinks he has proved something about LG because he has one that is fine. Anyway, I read the whole thing, and all the posts here and the premise is looking pretty silly. Actually, there was clearly nothing but vague speculation in the article itself. My prediction? This will amount to exactly nothing except possibly a waste of time.
 
I actually have an old LG Optimus Prime Fuel that I use every day for music streaming, it's 3 years old. Still works and no lag from updates (it's not a fast phone to begin with). We're also talking about hardware failure too. Why not just acknowledge the hardware gets slow over time and dies while other phones don't do that. The Italian government isn't investigating Samsung for fun, it's a serious issue.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-drawing-samsung-into-apples-battery-battles/

"AGCM said in a statement on its website that the inquiry was prompted by customer reports and its preliminary research. Both indicated that Apple and Samsung had exploited problems with their phones’ components to reduce their performance and encourage people to buy new devices, the agency said. AGCM did not specify which models it was looking into."
Once again, I have a Galaxy S2 that is 7years old that works fine, no hardware failure.
There plenty of people using Galaxy phones that are over 4years old like the Note 3 happily.

So what is your point?

It seems all you are trying to do is troll.
 
Once again, I have a Galaxy S2 that is 7years old that works fine, no hardware failure.
There plenty of people using Galaxy phones that are over 4years old like the Note 3 happily.

So what is your point?

It seems all you are trying to do is troll.
He is a troll when the topic is anti Samsung. Other times he's fine. Trying to prove that there is a conspiracy with no real proof.

The only reason why Samsung is also being investigated and LG is not because LG is too small to even bother with. Hardly anyone uses them outside thr US. They're like 4% of the market share worldwide as of Sept 2017. In other words, they're practically irrelevant. The 4th biggest manufacturer is Xiaomi with 7.4%, nearly twice that of LG.
 
He is a troll when the topic is anti Samsung. Other times he's fine. Trying to prove that there is a conspiracy with no real proof.

The only reason why Samsung is also being investigated and LG is not because LG is too small to even bother with. Hardly anyone uses them outside thr US. They're like 4% of the market share worldwide as of Sept 2017. In other words, they're practically irrelevant. The 4th biggest manufacturer is Xiaomi with 7.4%, nearly twice that of LG.
Indeed.

Let's not forget that LG lost majority of what little was left of their reputation due to the Bootloop issue of the Nexus 5X, G4, G5, V10 and V20
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...-months-for-those-affected-by-bootloop-issue/

I wonder if he considers that "Planned Obsolescence". Those were multiple devices that were affected with it.
 
And? We have users here who have used Samsung phones for years and still have them without lag... Yet you dismiss them.

Why should you having that old phone excuse the G6 video? By your own standards shouldn't the people here saying they have no issues with Samsung be enough if you saying your one LG phone doesn't have issues so that excuses LG?

Why do you think TouchWiz is nicknamed LagWhiz? People do notice the phone's performance drop after some time, there's many evidence. Yes, many people don't experience it, but many do. I've used Samsung phones for 6 years, I know that Samsung has very bad RAM management and problems arise overtime. I used to work at Best Buy too and was in charge of updating people's phones. The new update lags incredibly on older phones. If it slows down the phone, why release the update? I'm not specifically advocating for LG I've just recently started using one doesn't mean I think it's the greatest and everyone should buy it. I'm questioning Samsung's issues and you're dismissing it saying there's no evidence when there is and diverting the topic to me advocating for LG. What Samsung does is it uses high resolution icons and UI on their OS and it is one of the many reasons why it lags, AKA LagWhiz, which gets worse overtime. The Italian government opened the investigation because of consumer complaints. You can dismiss that but it's a fact people are experiencing issues.
 
Why do you think TouchWiz is nicknamed LagWhiz? People do notice the phone's performance drop after some time, there's many evidence. Yes, many people don't experience it, but many do. I've used Samsung phones for 6 years, I know that Samsung has very bad RAM management and problems arise overtime. I used to work at Best Buy too and was in charge of updating people's phones. The new update lags incredibly on older phones. If it slows down the phone, why release the update? I'm not specifically advocating for LG I've just recently started using one doesn't mean I think it's the greatest and everyone should buy it. I'm questioning Samsung's issues and you're dismissing it saying there's no evidence when there is and diverting the topic to me advocating for LG. What Samsung does is it uses high resolution icons and UI on their OS and it is one of the many reasons why it lags, AKA LagWhiz, which gets worse overtime. The Italian government opened the investigation because of consumer complaints. You can dismiss that but it's a fact people are experiencing issues.
Okay so some don't experience it but many do.. I also never dismissed it. I'm saying by your logic people experience lag so Samsung is doing it on purpose... So therefore isn't LG doing it on purpose since they have people having the same issue?

That G6 video has many people having issues. So can you please answer my question on why does LG make their phones lag? Many people do so by you logic it is planned obsolescence, right?
 
Why do you think TouchWiz is nicknamed LagWhiz? People do notice the phone's performance drop after some time, there's many evidence. Yes, many people don't experience it, but many do. I've used Samsung phones for 6 years, I know that Samsung has very bad RAM management and problems arise overtime. I used to work at Best Buy too and was in charge of updating people's phones. The new update lags incredibly on older phones. If it slows down the phone, why release the update? I'm not specifically advocating for LG I've just recently started using one doesn't mean I think it's the greatest and everyone should buy it. I'm questioning Samsung's issues and you're dismissing it saying there's no evidence when there is and diverting the topic to me advocating for LG. What Samsung does is it uses high resolution icons and UI on their OS and it is one of the many reasons why it lags, AKA LagWhiz, which gets worse overtime. The Italian government opened the investigation because of consumer complaints. You can dismiss that but it's a fact people are experiencing issues.
Again you have no real point.

People have complaints about everything. Can you please name me one piece of technology that absolutely nobody complains about? No!

A few Samsung Haters calling TouchWiz "Lagwiz" is not real proof come on dude, you are desperately grasping at straws. If this issue was big Samsung would not be top smartphone maker.

Your argument was about "planned obsolescence" in hardware now you are talking software and lag - issues that affect most Androids in anyway, your whole argument is falling apart, you are even using terms like "Lagwiz" that all sorts of trolls use all over tech blog comments, lol.

Please stop this nonsense, comeback with a real argument.

Your Italian government reference also holds no real weight, nobody's bothered to give more information on the investigation.
 
Okay so some don't experience it but many do.. I also never dismissed it. I'm saying by your logic people experience lag so Samsung is doing it on purpose... So therefore isn't LG doing it on purpose since they have people having the same issue?

That G6 video has many people having issues. So can you please answer my question on why does LG make their phones lag? Many people do so by you logic it is planned obsolescence, right?

Question to you is why does Samsung does NOT allow you to revert back to an older OS? Even if you tried side-load, it would not work.. you can try but it may brick your phone. It's because they don't want you to revert back to normal when the phone was working perfectly fine without the updates and just like it was when you first purchased it. There's no excuse for blocking the ability to do that. With a laptop you can actually revert back and do a real factory reset with the old and original version. You will always see forum posts about people asking how to go back to the old OS because of instability and other problems.

BTW eversince I permanently disabled Windows Updates on me and my dad's computer, we both never ran into any problems again. My dad's computer was destroyed by Windows Updates, it just kept taking up more space, slowing down the PC, and eventually the computer got corrupted when I attempted to free up space. Same thing happened with my Windows laptop.. the updates crippled the performance and things started to malfunction. I already have anti-virus apps and Chrome anti-virus extensions + ad blockers so that helps with spyware and other security problems. What's the point of "security updates" if the device is painfully slow and almost unusable?

To turn off Windows Updates, press windows key + r (run) then type in services.msc and then scroll down to Windows Update and press disable. Do at your own risk but at least you won't have to factory reset annually bc of OS corruption from updates.
 
Last edited:
Question to you is why does Samsung does NOT allow you to revert back to an older OS? Even if you tried side-load, it would not work.. you can try but it may brick your phone. It's because they don't want you to revert back to normal when the phone was working perfectly fine without the updates and just like it was when you first purchased it. There's no excuse for blocking the ability to do that. With a laptop you can actually revert back and do a real factory reset with the old and original version. You will always see forum posts about people asking how to go back to the old OS because of instability and other problems.
Uh, what do you mean Samsung? Every Android carries the risk of bricking if downgraded. Even your beloved LG. To downgrade both needs to use a third party tool. You know why you can't revert on Android? Because there is nothing left to revert to. On a laptop, when you upgrade, the laptop keeps an image of the old OS on the hard drive so that if you wish to downgrade, you can. If you upgraded to Windows 10 from 8, you will find a folder called Old Windows sized 30GB. That's the OS for the old version. Android is not able to keep those files because of storage limitations. If you want that ability on an Android, that would mean you need at least 10GB free when you do an update when you're using a flagship phone. That's unreasonable.

Honestly the more you reply to this topic the more you show you have no idea what you are talking about.
 
Uh, what do you mean Samsung? Every Android carries the risk of bricking if downgraded. Even your beloved LG. To downgrade both needs to use a third party tool. You know why you can't revert on Android? Because there is nothing left to revert to. On a laptop, when you upgrade, the laptop keeps an image of the old OS on the hard drive so that if you wish to downgrade, you can. If you upgraded to Windows 10 from 8, you will find a folder called Old Windows sized 30GB. That's the OS for the old version. Android is not able to keep those files because of storage limitations. If you want that ability on an Android, that would mean you need at least 10GB free when you do an update when you're using a flagship phone. That's unreasonable.

Honestly the more you reply to this topic the more you show you have no idea what you are talking about.

You can download the factory image on SamMobile.com and use Odin to install the software. Yes, you can re-install the OS if you soft bricked your Samsung, however an error will occur if you try to downgrade anything lower than the current version. Back then, they allowed you to do that, however nowadays you cannot because they don't want you to. You can still downgrade if you rooted your phone somehow but that's another story, plus once you get past a certain firmware, it's impossible bc they locked it. Keep coming up with excuses for it all you want, truth is they don't want reverse engineering and discourage repairs and instead encourage purchasing new devices.

BTW I do know what I'm talking about, I've used Samsung eversince their infancy for 6 years back when Samsung phones weren't popular and HTC and Apple were, plus I worked at Best Buy and Samsung. Here is the page to download Samsung factory images:

https://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/
 
You can download the factory image on SamMobile.com and use Odin to install the software. Yes, you can re-install the OS if you soft bricked your Samsung, however an error will occur if you try to downgrade anything lower than the current version. Back then, they allowed you to do that, however nowadays you cannot because they don't want you to. You can still downgrade if you rooted your phone somehow but that's another story. Keep coming up with excuses for it all you want, truth is they don't want reverse engineering and discourage repairs and instead encourage purchasing new devices.

BTW I do know what I'm talking about, I've used Samsung ever since their infancy for 6 years plus I worked at Best Buy and Samsung. Here is the page to download Samsung factory images:

https://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/
Actually guys in XDA are successful in downgrading from Nougat to Marshmallow on the S7 Edge even after the alleged blocking patch.

And same again, it's not just Samsung. There are LG models with stern warnings on XDA to not even attempt to downgrade.

All your posts just assumes what Samsung wants. I still remember when you championed LG because they stuck to removable batteries. Guess whay, they went away.

As for them wanting you to buy a new phone every year, you must be naive to think only Samsung wants you to do that. Every single manufacturer in the world wants you to do that. But as it is, you have nothing but anecdotal evidence against Samsung.

I'm playing Plants vs Zombies on my still functioning Galaxy S3 by the way, and using my 10 year old Galaxy Fit as an alarm clock. Take that planned obsolescence.
 
Question to you is why does Samsung does NOT allow you to revert back to an older OS? Even if you tried side-load, it would not work.. you can try but it may brick your phone. It's because they don't want you to revert back to normal when the phone was working perfectly fine without the updates and just like it was when you first purchased it. There's no excuse for blocking the ability to do that. With a laptop you can actually revert back and do a real factory reset with the old and original version. You will always see forum posts about people asking how to go back to the old OS because of instability and other problems.

BTW eversince I permanently disabled Windows Updates on me and my dad's computer, we both never ran into any problems again. My dad's computer was destroyed by Windows Updates, it just kept taking up more space, slowing down the PC, and eventually the computer got corrupted when I attempted to free up space. Same thing happened with my Windows laptop.. the updates crippled the performance and things started to malfunction. I already have anti-virus apps and Chrome anti-virus extensions + ad blockers so that helps with spyware and other security problems. What's the point of "security updates" if the device is painfully slow and almost unusable?

To turn off Windows Updates, press windows key + r (run) then type in services.msc and then scroll down to Windows Update and press disable. Do at your own risk but at least you won't have to factory reset annually bc of OS corruption from updates.

To be honest... I only posted in this thread to see if you were making a thread to actually debate the topic at hand or if you were doing a one-sided bash fest. I can see it is the latter.

We have many members asking you questions and posting their own experiences and you seem to just dismiss that and go off your "evidence" that you find on Reddit. You take things you have read there versus what the members are telling you of their own experiences here. When questioned about the manufacturer you love (LG) you seem to dismiss / pivot. An example is this post here. You are pivoting so hard you are going off-topic into things about Windows Updates which wasn't even close to what was asked or even close to the topic of mobile operating systems... You're talking about desktops.

I highly suggest if you are going to make controversial topics to debate/discuss you do so with the actual intent to do just that... debate/discuss. This post is obviously not that as you just want to bash / say what you feel and disregard every other member in this thread regardless of what they say. That isn't a discussion or a fun debate... that is just you trying to stir the pot and poke at Samsung users. There is zero reason to do this. I myself am no longer a Samsung user but do you see me trying to make topics to bash their choice? No. Why? It isn't helpful nor wanted by the community.

Debates/Discussions can be fun and on this forum we have had many. A lot have been good and a lot of good ideas/view points get hashed out in a good way. This post is none of those as it seems you would rather just post to bash / stir the pot with other forum members simply because you don't like their choice in a phone.

This thread will be closed since it provides nothing good and honestly isn't fair to the Samsung users in their own section since you seem to just bash and not even debate with them. If you have questions you can send me a PM.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending Posts

Forum statistics

Threads
957,755
Messages
6,974,310
Members
3,163,901
Latest member
cecilyharper