- May 2, 2012
- 191
- 7
- 0
does Android L = Android 5.0?
just wondering
Nobody knows for sure, but probably.
So far, with the exception of 1.x to 2.x, each integer increase has represented a spread to or change in the handling of a device type. 3.0 was tablets only (later used on Google TV), 4.0 unified tablets and phones, 5.0 would make sense with the spread to wear and the car. It begs the question of what 6.0 might spread to?
I agree with Jerry on the rationale that since L is 50 in Roman numerals, we can probably expect Android L to be 5.0. This is a UI redesign, so wouldn't it also make sense for it to move to a new integer, similar to how Ice Cream Sandwich's UI redesign moved Android from 2.3/3.x to 4.0?
So far (since 2010) moving between integers has represented expansion to new platforms. I'd be very surprised if this wasn't 5.0, but I have no idea what the L and 50 would have to do with anything... since that wasn't used in any letter combination so far.
Not that it has any serious effect on the nomenclature, but it seems to be a natural thought, at least to me. I think this is a major enough update to warrant a move to 5.0. I hadn't considered the point about new platforms but that all but certifies it IMO.So far (since 2010) moving between integers has represented expansion to new platforms. I'd be very surprised if this wasn't 5.0, but I have no idea what the L and 50 would have to do with anything... since that wasn't used in any letter combination so far.
They said it's one of the biggest Android changeover since it was launched...
I think it's definitely 5.0 this time!
Posted via Android Central App
Most of the changes with Android L are cosmetic. The added APIs and new features are numerous but none of what KitKat changed and brought to the table are being changed. You could literally take the KK and L updates and bundle them and neither would conflict. So to the user L seems huge so it is an easy point to embellish but KK was a much larger change to the inner working of the OS.
Not sure about most of you but the look of Android is not the most important element for me.
Google is telling us that L is the largest change to date. Of course, they're not going to mention if it's the 2nd or 3rd biggest change, etc they have to sell it a little.. but just curious why do you think it is not that big of a change?
These don't feel cosmetic:Most of the changes with Android L are cosmetic.