Engadget says EVO a little better than Epic in their Epic Review!

dfine1966

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2010
389
10
0
I was just over reading Engadget and they were doing the review of the Samsung Epic 4G, and if I read them right, they still said the EVO was better by the thinnest of margins.

Here is there conclusions and I will also provide the link.

"So is it the right phone for the job? In a word, yes -- the Epic 4G is a great device. Killer, even. Nothing speaks to us more strongly during the course of a review than finishing it and saying, "alright, I'm ready to buy this thing," and the Epic is on the short list of phones that has managed to do it. More than its Galaxy S siblings, it feels like the Epic has overcome its shortcomings -- notably the forgettable UI skin -- to shine, and it's a phone we could easily imagine using day to day. Only thing is, the EVO is also on that short list for us -- and the better camera, bigger screen, and $50 savings versus the Epic still make it our winner in this 4G shootout, though only by the thinnest of margins. Needless to say, if you need a physical keyboard and you're looking for the one of the most musclebound Android phones money can buy, we wouldn't hesitate to recommend it."

Epic 4G review -- Engadget


My point is that the the EVO is on par with the Epic even with the Super Amoled screen and the Epic's keyboard.
 
The keyboard is the only difference most users care about. We care about things like the better GPU, SAMOLED screens etc. But yes, the Evo is still an amazing phone and should be competitive for quite some time.
 
Gizmodo went the other direction and picked the Epic over the Evo. Seems that Gizmodo is more hardware focused where Engadget is more "user experience" focused. Either way, I'm happily on the waiting list at my local Best Buy for my Evo.
 
I think its crazy to compare both phones, but its good to put a sock in all those "the Epic is better then the Evos" mouth. I kept telling everyone there only bashing the Evo for the stupid reasons, I'd rather have a bigger screen then a smaller better looking one. I can type faster on my Evos touchscreen then any of my friends with a physical keyboard on there phone. I have a kickstand to watch movie and clips and not have to hold it, and with it having a camera that can record in a better higher resolution, it all makes me wonder why everyone still play, the evo is capped at 30fps crap.
 
The EVO is a great phone. It should be good till next summer when the EVO2 comes out against the iPhone 5 wimax
 
The EVO is a great phone. It should be good till next summer when the EVO2 comes out against the iPhone 5 wimax

iPhone 5 wimax? At&t doesn't use WiMax for its fourth generation radio signal... unless you are referring to iPhone going to Verizon.
 
I find it telling how biased and untrustworthy Engadget is given that they pick the EVO's screen over the EPIC's because it's bigger (by .3"), but yet they pick the iphone4's (.8" smaller) screen over the EVO's!

I have the EVO, my wife had the iphone4, returned it and got a captivate, and while I like my EVO better, her S-Amoled screen blows away my EVO's.
 
Except the iphone will have an 8meg camera whereas the competitors will have at least a ten or twelve megs. With higher hdmi output and better compression ratio.



Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
 
Except the iphone will have an 8meg camera whereas the competitors will have at least a ten or twelve megs. With higher hdmi output and better compression ratio.



Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk

Megapixels mean squat.
 
I think if you read their article the EVO only came out ahead because of the price difference. Absent that difference the EPIC was considered the better phone.
 

Trending Posts

Forum statistics

Threads
960,480
Messages
6,982,551
Members
3,164,527
Latest member
Lilrose