I just picked up my GW5,44mm this morning. I am a runner and cyclist and I know that this watch won't be as good as fitness-specific devices from Garmin, Polar, etc. However, I am wanting to have a little more peace-of-mind when out alone, far from help, so I picked up the LTE version of this Samsung.
On a couple of test walks today, the location was quite poor, disappointingly so. Compared to what my 7-year-old TomTom running watch was showing me, it was horrid. However, I found that the location accuracy was not set to the highest level in the watch settings. It was only using GPS, not cell towers, etc. I turned this on and went out for another walk. While not perfect, it was significantly better.
I also discovered that TomTom must be using some type of software "smoothing" because the workout that was recorded on it also gets automatically passed to TrainingPeaks. Even though it's the exact same workout file being sent there, the map on TrainingPeaks was MUCH more choppy than that of the TomTom site!
As for mileage, it was exactly what I expected it to be. I've always known that for whatever reason, my TomTom watch would be about .01 of a mile short on the first quarter mile, meaning it would tell me that I'd reached .25 when I'd only reached about .24 or .235, somewhere in that range. When I compared the mileage, they were about .01 off, with the TomTom at .48 and the SGW at .47, so I'm thinking pretty spot on.
Hopefully, both of us will see improved accuracy as we go on.