GS3 or Note 2

And I think a lot depends on what you are wanting, a phone or a camera? If someone is wanting a great camera, they should get a camera. While I use my camera some, I buy my phone for how it operates as a smartphone.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Android Central Forums
 
I played with both when picking out my phone. I chose the S3 because the Note2 is just too big. Too big to slide in a pocket, too big to fit into a clutch if I'm going out. The S3 is awesome and I have no regrets.
 
"Shooting options are pretty basic for the iPhone 5 with no controls over things like ISO or white balance, but you do get HDR and the new panorama mode. The Samsung and HTC, on the other hand, are closer to using a standalone point-and-shoot, with different scene modes and more control over results (though I doubt these things will matter to most people) and they, too, have HDR and panorama modes that essentially work the same as the iPhone's."

Apple iPhone 5 vs. Samsung Galaxy S3 vs. HTC One X: The cameras | Cell Phones - CNET Reviews
 
That's not quite what the article said...

Soundsgood is likely biased toward the iPhone, so that's how he took it.
Really? How am I being biased? If anything, I was hoping the Samsung's camera would be better.

For the record, here's the conclusion from the article:

Conclusion

In our head-to-head comparison of the two phones we originally said the Samsung Galaxy S3 camera edged out the iPhone 5. However, after this more comprehensive test, the iPhone 5 wins. The Galaxy S3 camera app offers more options and granular control of the camera. It also did a better job in the Outdoor Detail test and tied the iPhone 5 in depth of field. The iPhone 5 narrowly took the Outdoor, Indoor, Medium Light, Macro, Low Light and Quick Fix rounds.

Of course, a buyer shouldn?t pick one phone over the other just because of the camera. But if somone needs a tie-breaker, then get the Apple iPhone 5 for the slightly better camera. People who want a lot of control might think they should get the Galaxy S3 due to the more powerful camera app. However, iPhone users can download great camera apps that give the user just as much control as they get with the GS3.

 
Really? How am I being biased? If anything, I was hoping the Samsung's camera would be better.

For the record, here's the conclusion from the article:

Conclusion

In our head-to-head comparison of the two phones we originally said the Samsung Galaxy S3 camera edged out the iPhone 5. However, after this more comprehensive test, the iPhone 5 wins. The Galaxy S3 camera app offers more options and granular control of the camera. It also did a better job in the Outdoor Detail test and tied the iPhone 5 in depth of field. The iPhone 5 narrowly took the Outdoor, Indoor, Medium Light, Macro, Low Light and Quick Fix rounds.

Of course, a buyer shouldn?t pick one phone over the other just because of the camera. But if somone needs a tie-breaker, then get the Apple iPhone 5 for the slightly better camera. People who want a lot of control might think they should get the Galaxy S3 due to the more powerful camera app. However, iPhone users can download great camera apps that give the user just as much control as they get with the GS3.


I owned the iphone 5 (and all the others before it) the GS3 and am now rockin the Note 2,,,,,,,, my opinion on the camera,,, the iphone 5 does edge out the GS3 and the Note 2,,,, but not by a huge amount.

The N2 and the GS3 do take great pictures and video,,, but when I was doing a side by side comparison the iphone 5 did have the best results.

Sorry iphone haters,,,, I use and like both iOS and Android.

But with that being said the Note 2 is still the best phone on the planet, followed by the GS3 and then the iphone 5.

Sent from my ipad while my Nexus 10 tablet is charging.

Cheers
Davyo
 
If you're worried about the size of the note.. especially if youve used one and already know what you're getting into, just get the GS3. Deals are awesome right now, theyre friggin everywhere lol. Awesome phone minus the bigger battery and screen of the Note. Almost a 5" screen... def more than enough for me :thumbup:

Sent from my MetroPCS GS3

That's the truth! kinda scary too... I hope it doesn't become the next Evo 4g! I love my GS3, but last time I bought Sprint's flagship phone it rapidly became the worst device I Have ever owned and jumped to the Nexus S 4G 3 months later!
 
Hi,
I have the GS3 since a few weeks. And though I really love this phone, if I could decide NOW which one to chose, I would go for the Note 2. Just for playing around with this great big screen and everything about the S-Pen :-).
 
I just got the GSIII before Christmas. I upgraded from the Droid Bionic. I would have liked the Note 2, but I refuse to pay $300 for another phone. So, with the $51 I got for the Bionic and the $50 Google Play credit I got, I actually made $1 by getting the GSIII

I guess I can deal with this for the next 2 years.

And while I liked the DNA, the lack of an SD slot was a deal killer for me.
 
That is a carrier issue, not a phone issue. I thought Verizon has the update out now.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Android Central Forums

Verizon does have jelly bean update so you would get JB as soon as you turned the phone it would prompt you to update

Sent from my GT-N8013 using Android Central Forums
 
Too much to try to quote from my handset, so:

@Soundsgood: A marginal victory in one test is not a clear victory in things like this. Having taken quite a few photos with my Note 2, the comparison shots in the article look as if they didn't use the built-in camera app to its fullest potential. The iPhone in this, as all things really, is set up to automatically give you what most Apple customers think is best. Android settings aren't like that. You have to manipulate it to get the best out of it, and that's rather how it was intended to be. Out-of-the-box pointing and shooting the iPhone photos do indeed look a little better, but by using the options afforded to me in the stock camera app I can at least match if not surpass them.

@Davyo We aren't iPhone haters. If we were we wouldn't give it a shred if credit at all. IMO, Apple's phones are geared toward one type of person while Android devices are geared toward another. One is for people who just want to snatch up a device and go, the other is for people who like to do things for themselves and customize.

@KWP1911 While price point may have been a deciding factor for you, it has no play in a hardware comparison.

Sent from my SCH-R950 using Tapatalk 2
 
Id say get an s3 and a cheap tablet.
The N2 isnt big in the hand but in the pocket..... not to mention with a case......!
As someone said, droid DNA mmm seems just the right size.
Only get N4 if you have great unlmited data or dont like music :)
Id love the note 2 but the s3 4.1.2 update is pretty amazing especialy if u overclock it.
Im gona say s3!
Or..... the GT-i9305
Quad core, 4g, and 2gb ram :)

MERRY XMAS!!!X
Unbranded international s3 with Official 4.1.2 JB. Paisley, Slotland, Western Europe :beer:
 
@Soundsgood: A marginal victory in one test is not a clear victory in things like this. Having taken quite a few photos with my Note 2, the comparison shots in the article look as if they didn't use the built-in camera app to its fullest potential. The iPhone in this, as all things really, is set up to automatically give you what most Apple customers think is best. Android settings aren't like that. You have to manipulate it to get the best out of it, and that's rather how it was intended to be. Out-of-the-box pointing and shooting the iPhone photos do indeed look a little better, but by using the options afforded to me in the stock camera app I can at least match if not surpass them.
I totally get what you're saying (and sincerely appreciate the help). In my case I don't want to fiddle with any settings before taking a shot with my phone camera. I want to be able to just pull the phone out of my pocket, point, and shoot. So I want a phone that takes reasonably decent shots "out of the box" that are at least as good as the iPhone.

By the way, I own a Canon 40D DSLR with lots of lenses and a Canon HF100 video camera... so if I want a REALLY good picture or video I've got the tools for that (and of course I change the ISO and aperture per shoot). But for my quick shots that simply capture life, I don't wanna touch any controls.

Id say get an s3 and a cheap tablet. The N2 isnt big in the hand but in the pocket..... not to mention with a case......!
Funny, I just now (5 minutes ago) came from looking at a Note 2 and cases for it. While I love the size when holding it and using it, I'm not sure I'd want something that large for my pocket -- especially with the case. Even my 9 year old son was like, "uhh, no dad, that's too big!" :)
 
I was in a Radio Shack store the other day, and noticed that the GS3's were now selling (regular price) for $99. But the original Galaxy Note is still up at $149. Probably due to the growing popularity and sales of the Note & Note 2. My wife sure loves hers. :rolleyes: She uses it like a small tablet, which it is? with a phone built-in. She even sets it on the kitchen island when she's cooking ? so she can read & scroll through recipes ? or have video chats with friends & family, etc., which of course is really nice with the big display.
 
Lol its weird reading americans talk about phone prices :) we tend to talk about the price of the actual unit :)

MERRY XMAS!!!X
Unbranded international s3 with Official 4.1.2 JB. Paisley, Slotland, Western Europe :beer:
 

Trending Posts

Forum statistics

Threads
957,755
Messages
6,974,311
Members
3,163,901
Latest member
cecilyharper