King Of The Thing
New member
- May 27, 2011
- 1
- 0
- 0
If I don't have a sim card in the phone will I still get the update?(wifi)
whats the difference with this update vs side load wonder machine?
Well, I just got mine this morning. So, finally, I can say without a shadow of a doubt that it is in progress. Don't know if I'll ever even use it, but I guess it's pretty cool to have the option. Hopefully it won't take too much longer for everyone to get what it is they want. (At least for today. Tomorrow will be some new "want" or "should already have" or some other thing people have been "cheated" out of.)It's kinda funny to me, if you look around this and other forums, how AT&T has screwed people over that haven't got the update yet. Thing is, didn't they buy this and any other Android from AT&T knowing that sideloading wasn't allowed without a "back door" means of doing it? And yeah, I know, "AT&T should have allowed it from the start." Blah, blah, yada, yada. If they didn't, and you know it, then why did you contract with them? Moreover, why keep complaining when you are still getting exactly what you contracted into? Believe me, if I could find a way, I would give up my "unknown sources" option to one of the cheated people just to be able to move on.
Because I bought my phone after the 25th of May when this update was to be available to all users![]()
Well, I just got mine this morning. So, finally, I can say without a shadow of a doubt that it is in progress. Don't know if I'll ever even use it, but I guess it's pretty cool to have the option. Hopefully it won't take too much longer for everyone to get what it is they want. (At least for today. Tomorrow will be some new "want" or "should already have" or some other thing people have been "cheated" out of.)It's kinda funny to me, if you look around this and other forums, how AT&T has screwed people over that haven't got the update yet. Thing is, didn't they buy this and any other Android from AT&T knowing that sideloading wasn't allowed without a "back door" means of doing it? And yeah, I know, "AT&T should have allowed it from the start." Blah, blah, yada, yada. If they didn't, and you know it, then why did you contract with them? Moreover, why keep complaining when you are still getting exactly what you contracted into? Believe me, if I could find a way, I would give up my "unknown sources" option to one of the cheated people just to be able to move on.
Actually, most people that bought the phone didn't know because AT&T doesn't disclose these things at the time of purchase. Installing from unknown sources is a standard feature that you wouldn't expect to be disabled. We knew about it because we frequent gadget websites and forums like this one, but the average customer doesn't. In fact, the average customer doesn't likely even know what unknown sources means. Being able to install what you want on your phone is just expected. Yes, eventually word does get around better, but look at what happened with HSPUA. Nobody knew it was going to be disabled. When I bought my device, it was not even known on these type of sites and AT&T did not disclose this to me. I'd say peoole have a right to complain about the crap AT&T is pulling with Android.
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk
BUUUUUUUUUUT, AT&T also has a 30 day return policy. As does pretty much anywhere else you buy a phone. Logic would dictate that, if there was something you wanted or needed, AND if you didn't research a company's policies prior to signing a contract, AND if you actually signed something without reading what fine print you are contracting yourself into, SURELY someone would realize within a month that this isn't what they want. So, that being said, there is no reason for someone to stay with a company that isn't giving them what they want, and there is more than enough opportunity to get out of it. After all of that, is there really a reason for people to complain about getting only what they signed up for? I'm no advocate for AT&T, but fair is fair. Seems to me that they are already giving everyone more than they originally asked for, and people are still complaining that it's not fast enough to suit our spoiled, instant gratification attitude.
Umm, actually no. HSPUA being disabled wasn't in writing anywheres and when it was first discovered, AT&T initially denied it. So it was beyond thirty days before it was confirmed. Choosing to leave a carrier based on something being disabled on a device is not logic. Choosing a carrier based on service in your paricular area is. No other carriers are doing to Android the kind of crap that AT&T is choosing to do. That in itself says something. You can defend AT&T's approach all you want, but I'm not buying it. I'm not sure if you are an employee or just a fanboy, but I respect that you are entitled to your own opinion, no matter how flawed it might be.
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk
How utterly respectful of you to allow me to be flawed. LOL
Nah, I am neither an employee or a fanboy. I am a person responsible enough to read and research before entering into a contract irresponsibly. My only point is that I see a significant amount, on this and other sites, of someone wanting to bash on someone else. That seems to be what so many people join forums for now - to be able to ***** anonymously. AT&T has it's flaws. So do Verizon and all the others. So do I and so do you. Still incessant complaining hasn't gotten anyone anything other than more frustration.
The iPhone approach that AT&T took with Android is what is flawed. Android is the apple of many of it's customer's eyes and they don't appreciate AT&T taking a bite out of it. By enabling hsupa and installing from unknown sources, AT&T has itself admitted this. I was wrong for doing these things and now I'm going to fix them. Thank you. Unfortunately, it's not as simple as anticipated and AT&T has never been swift about anything as is. Patience is required, but at least we know AT&T is willing to make amends. Now let's just see if they hold up to that commitment with Google and the manufacturers about putting out OS upgrades in a more timely manner. If the other carriers can do it, so can AT&T.
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk