I'm going to wait for reviews. If Google wants to play with Apple and Samsung in the high-price sandbox, they need to bring their no-compromise A-game to justify the price increase over the Nexus line. For me, this means:
- Best in class camera, and not just on paper. I want to see camera samples that equal or exceed what the Galaxy S7, HTC 10, and iPhone 7 can put out.
- Honest-to-god all-day battery life under moderate to heavy use, with no service compromises. That means unplug at 7, work all day, and still have some in the tank by 10 pm with location, GPS, bluetooth, etc. all turned on. No battery anxiety.
- Premium construction. No flex, no flimsiness, no fluff-catching seams, and a surface that doesn't scratch if you look at it funny (hello iPhone Piano Black).
- No lag. Zero. Zilch. Not even a hiccup. And no slowdown after a couple of weeks of use.
- Guaranteed two years of timely updates (no weeks-long delays for updates at the end of its life like the poor Nexus 6 just experienced). This can't be predicted in a review, of course, but it would help justify the cost.
Extreme? Maybe, but Google got close to this list with the last run of Nexus phones, and they were far cheaper. That lower price made them very tempting despite minor drawbacks. If they want to charge premium prices, the Pixel can no longer be "good enough." It has to be absolutely great for it to stand a chance at success against the marketing might of Samsung and Apple. This particular road is littered with phones that tried and failed to travel it.