- Jul 25, 2010
- 280
- 31
- 28
This has been the speculation since the 24th was pined as the date. Nothing new here.
The purpose of the article was not about the 24th. But the reason why the TB was delayed. There were widespread speculation about hotspots, LTE radio etc etc. But to see an article about the iPhone was maybe causing the delay!!
This has been the general consensus amongst the community, and I have absolutely zero reason to think it's not entirely plausible. I also wouldn't be entirely surprised if Apple had some influence on it's delayed lunch as well, but again that's all based on hearsay and speculation.
Wouldn't it have been easier for Verizon to say from the beginning the 24th? That way we would have never considered it to be "late".
Point is if they wanted to delay for iphone returns, and they know that people were waiting for this phone (which they do), then it makes more sense to just announce a later date originally so that nobody is angry/confused about it.Verizon never announced a date.
Wouldn't it have been easier for Verizon to say from the beginning the 24th? That way we would have never considered it to be "late".
They haven't even said the 24th either.
If we didn't know about this phone you'd almost swear it was vaporware.
Thats whats killing me... Wish VZW would say look its going to be the 24th, March, etc... Fine I can deal with that no big, I have waited this long I can wait longer but why so tight lipped about it... The only official word from VZW was CES and other than that it been speculation and rumors.