westiewanderer
Well-known member
- Jan 16, 2011
- 195
- 0
- 0
I had the G4, and it was a good phone, but I currently have the V10 and it is an AMAZING phone! I would highly recommend the V10!
Not everyone have V10 money to buy one... Like in my case. I will probably upgrade to the G4 from my current G3 device.I had the G4, and it was a good phone, but I currently have the V10 and it is an AMAZING phone! I would highly recommend the V10!
Some G4 with the starting serial code 505, 506, 507, 508 have motherboard issues. Not all are affected and these issues are supposed to be fixed in G4 that were built on Sep or after Sept, 2015. So basically if you are in the market for a G4, make sure it was built after Sept 2015, just to be sure.Just out of interest what are all these "issues" with the g4.
Also where do I find the serial number with regards to 505 506 etc and what is it about pre Sept/ Aug phones
Posted via the Android Central App
It will say it on the packaging box that come with the phone. Serial number and build date.How do I find serial number and when mine was built
Posted via the Android Central App
That's true as well.And that serial number (not to be confused with the IMEI) is printed on the device behind the battery.
Posted via the Android Central App
Yeah, coming from the HTC M8, this is the G4's only weak point. Everything else knocks it out of the park.I've had no problems. Great phone overall. External speaker is g4's only flaw, IMO
Posted via the Android Central App
Yeah, coming from the HTC M8, this is the G4's only weak point. Everything else knocks it out of the park.
I definitely agree with you! Everyone's experiences and viewpoints are more subjective than objective; which makes it really difficult for one to gain a factual answer regarding things like mic issues/hearing quality. Something that is fairly objective is being skewed by things like opinions, experiences, etc.; which isn't *all bad,* but it does make you wonder what is actually happening - are these answers more based on specs and information they've read (and are *those* things clouded with bias and judgment, too?); or are they more biased in nature? Scoial scientists are taught that there is always a certain level of bias in everything; and I believe that is absolutely true.
Agreed! I think after a while, all the information/"research" we obtain kind of goes in one ear and out the other, so to speak: we get overwhelmed with information/reviews and eventually, we don't know what to do with all of it. I think at a certain point in the device researching process, one really needs to go out and try the phone him/herself, so he/she can get more of their own reality/experience to add to the table; and then you can add in your own judgments and objective/subjective reports.
I love that too! Phone forums are the best!Please let us know what your final phone decision will be!
![]()
You bring something awesome to the table; collyesta; and social scientists try to put this notion forward when analyzing research trends.
People tend to (and this is obviously not representative of "everyone") write or post about negative things; like devices or reviews of specific establishments. For instance, I've seen workplace attractions on Facebook and a lot of the reviews I've read are from "dissatisfied" customers... And yet, when someone has a good experience, they may not feel as inclined to let people know about it. The same could be true with devices: when you go to do research on a particular device, a lot of the things that may come up are negative reviews or the seemingly-rampant search results on forum pages of issues with the device... I came across this when I researched the G3 at times. However, if people are more likely to post about queries or issues with the device, we may ascertain that the device is fraught with problems; because we do not see as many positive reviews of the device/praise reports.
Just something I like to think about, and think is totally relevant for device forums and customer/guest reviews of different establishments.