Moto G (fourth gen/2016)

Particularly since...

Here's how T-Mobile presents their coverage:

http://www.linxnet.com/misc/images/TMO_Michigan_Extended_Coverage.png

Their site no longer gives the option of showing their coverage without their "Extended LTE" network. No need to wonder why. Here's what Sensorly reports for T-Mobile 2G/3G coverage in the same area:

http://www.linxnet.com/misc/images/TMO_Michigan_2G-3G_Coverage.png

Quite a difference, no? That's the coverage my wife and I, for example, would get. Now one could argue that, my phone being now three years old: It's on me. But my wife's six month old phone that was originally listed to include Band 12?

To be fair: I only have Lenovo/Motorola/whatever's claim that TMO's VoLTE certification process is painstaking and expensive. For all I know: They're simply being cheapskates. Or trying to persuade customers to move up to the more expensive X.

I'm in grand rapids and had to cancel project fi because any time I was on Tmobile I couldn't do voice+data. I'm very unimpressed with tmobiles service in general, which is why i havent left verizon :-/
 
I'm in grand rapids and had to cancel project fi because any time I was on Tmobile I couldn't do voice+data. I'm very unimpressed with tmobiles service in general, which is why i havent left verizon :-/
Interesting. T-Mobile claims they have solid 4G LTE coverage in Grand Rapids, not dependent upon Band 12.
 

Trending Posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
960,920
Messages
6,984,226
Members
3,164,603
Latest member
spicyramentt