New articles by TheVerge on the Bixby disaster

quietlybrilliant

Well-known member
May 12, 2013
457
0
0
I mostly agree:

https://www.theverge.com/2017/9/18/16326636/samsung-bixby-button-bloatware

Also there's this article: https://www.theverge.com/circuitbre...samsung-bixby-button-galaxy-s8-note-8-disable

Has anybody received the update yet?

And a third article today:
https://www.theverge.com/2017/9/18/16308924/samsung-galaxy-note-8-live-messages-how-to-pen

FYI, a few weeks ago, TheVerge already reviewed the Note 8 pretty positively, with the biggest gripe being the tele camera (has anybody else confirmed that it's bad?): https://www.theverge.com/2017/9/5/16253308/samsung-galaxy-note-8-review
as well as Bixby: https://www.theverge.com/2017/7/19/15998258/samsung-bixby-voice-galaxy-s8-review
 
Last edited:
But watch what they say about IPhone X Siri button..... (Rant coming)...People complain about the button and how they're acciddently pressing it, smh. It's not Samsung's fault that you keep pressing the wrong button. People should pay attention to what they're doing and just press the right button. It's not hard to do. So I guess people also turn the volumn up when they mean to press the volumn down because they press the wrong button? If people would study the tutorials and learn how Bixby works they wouldn't complain that Bixby isn't good. And stop comparing it to Google Assistance. I took the time to learn and then train Bixby to my needs. It took practice but Bixby has learned my word pronunciation. Lastly, I feel if you didnt want a Bixby button you should have bought a different phone. I appreciate Samsung designing Bixby and giving me options to control my phone in different ways when needed.....But I bet IPhone X Siri button will be praised. (Rant over) lol.
 
Last edited:
I got it this morning, so I'm betting that you'll get it soon. It still brings Bixby voice up if you hold the key down, so doesn't appear to turn Bixby off completely.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20170918-114808.jpg
    Screenshot_20170918-114808.jpg
    132 KB · Views: 22
  • Screenshot_20170918-114841.jpg
    Screenshot_20170918-114841.jpg
    137.1 KB · Views: 23
  • Screenshot_20170918-115046.jpg
    Screenshot_20170918-115046.jpg
    107.1 KB · Views: 22
Whoever wrote that "The Verge" article obviously doesn't know much about cameras and sensors. Yes, it's true that the wide-angle camera has a slightly larger sensor than the zoom-lens camera, but the difference in size is essentially negligible. If you want to talk about image quality, run your phone through a shredder and get a "real" camera, with a sensor ten or twenty times larger, or more. And the difference between a 1.7 mm and a 2.4 mm aperture is also minimal -- go look at a cheap zoom camera, and you'll see zoom apertures around 6.0 or so. 2.4 mm is nothing to gripe about, whatsoever. In the end, yes, technically, the wide-angle camera is better than the zoom-lens camera, but I expect that anyone using a camera phone wouldn't notice any difference at all. If you take a small crop from similar pictures taken with each camera and blow them up to a large size, yes, then you might be able to discern a small difference, but in the normal usage of most people who use camera phones, nobody is going to notice any difference. Put those pictures on Facebook, which is going to cut the image quality back at least a fair amount, and nobody is going to notice the difference. And so on.

If this makes it through, here is a shot from the zoom-lens camera:

note8_005.jpg
 
Last edited:
Whoever wrote that "The Verge" article obviously doesn't know much about cameras and sensors. Yes, it's true that the wide-angle camera has a slightly larger sensor than the zoom-lens camera, but the difference in size is essentially negligible. If you want to talk about image quality, run your phone through a shredder and get a "real" camera, with a sensor ten or twenty times larger, or more. And the difference between a 1.7 mm and a 2.4 mm aperture is also minimal -- go look at a cheap zoom camera, and you'll see zoom apertures around 6.0 or so. 2.4 mm is nothing to gripe about, whatsoever. In the end, yes, technically, the wide-angle camera is better than the zoom-lens camera, but I expect that anyone using a camera phone would notice any difference at all. If you take a small crop from similar pictures taken with each camera and blow them up to a large size, yes, then you might be able to discern a small difference, but in the normal usage of most people who use camera phones, nobody is going to notice any difference. Put those pictures on Facebook, which is going to cut the image quality back at least a fair amount, and nobody is going to notice the difference. And so on.

If this makes it through, here is a shot from the zoom-lens camera:

View attachment 269212

In low light the difference is huge, owing to the smaller sensor and smaller aperture. The difference between a 1.7 and 2.4 aperture is huge. The 1.7 can transmit almost 100% more light than the 2.4 to the sensor, which coupled with a smaller sensor can be a very bad thing. (Which is why the zoom lens is terrible in low light)

Oh and the reason why those zoom cameras can get away with their apertures is because of their sensor size and lens composition. Just like how a dSLR will take great pictures at apertures that would be considered awful on a smartphone.
 
I got it this morning, so I'm betting that you'll get it soon. It still brings Bixby voice up if you hold the key down, so doesn't appear to turn Bixby off completely.

You can shut off Bixby Voice as well from Bixby Home:
 

Attachments

  • 3375.jpg
    3375.jpg
    5.1 KB · Views: 23

Latest posts

Trending Posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
957,619
Messages
6,973,811
Members
3,163,863
Latest member
EnigmaDragon