Gary02468
Well-known member
Dunno. The article linked above (by XDA editor-in-chief Mishaal Rahman) says "OEMs don’t want to sacrifice a few gigabytes of storage space to support seamless updates" and "Another reason OEMs may have chosen not to implement A/B partitions is cost: Keeping up with Google’s constant changes to Android’s partition schemes requires a lot of effort".You should [bear] in mind that this feature exists in Android already. It takes no more resources to engineer around it than to keep it enabled. The work has been done.
I have no independent knowledge of these considerations, so I can't say whether Rahman's assessment is correct, but it sounds plausible to me.
Last edited: