- Feb 6, 2017
- 96,063
- 11,609
- 113
Small claims in NY is 5000 last I heard.
I thought it was not small claims court? QUEENS SUPREME COURT
Small claims in NY is 5000 last I heard.
I thought it was not small claims court? QUEENS SUPREME COURT
I didn't say it was small claims court. I was responding to the post asking how much small claims allows in N.Y.
I didn't say it was small claims court. I was responding to the post asking how much small claims allows in N.Y.
I wonder how much she's suing for as well. What is the law in New York regarding what the amount has to be to get to a trial or small claims court? Just gives an idea how much she's asking for then. If she wasn't seriously injured and only her phone was destroyed and stuff in her purse like wallet and makeup were destroyed, suing for like 50k would be simply obscene and another example of lawsuit abuse. I can see a couple grand for her damages, phone is replaced under warranty and for her destroyed purse but that's it.
Probably she's suing for over that amount then. Again just plain obscene.
The G3 was a super heater. No matter the rom or what I ran on it it just got HOT. Both of them did that. I would put it in the freezer and it would fly when it chilled out. My note 8 barely gets warm when doing a marathon game. I loved the ergonomics of that phone, g3 electric blue, probably the most comfortable I ever used and it never caught on fire. felt like it though.
No, obviously not. How many days did it take to file the papers, and how many days do you think it takes for a good lawyer to do that (and what's your evidence for thinking so)?does that not sound like somebody had it teed up and was just waiting for a chance to hit for the hole in one?
Sorry to be such a skeptic, and not diminishing the fact she may have been injured, but just one incident; nothing similar to date; suit filed instantaneously with demand to stop production - does that not sound like somebody had it teed up and was just waiting for a chance to hit for the hole in one?
Hardly. Three weeks after the Note7 went on sale, there had been dozens of reported fires. Three weeks after the Note9 went on sale, there is a single, still-unconfirmed report.
Seriously? If her phone got hot in an elevator, she shouldn't have put it in her purse? What else should she have done with it? Was she supposed to anticipate that it was about to catch fire?
Phones are designed to be kept in bags, pockets, etc. Or on car dashboards in direct sunlight for hours, etc.
It's one thing to say (correctly) that we don't yet know for sure what happened. It's another to make up preposterous, victim-blaming criticisms just because you like the product and hope it's not defective.
Unless someone drives a nail through the phone, runs over it with a car, or inflicts similar abuse, it's Samsung's fault if it catches fire.
I wouldn't--especially if the phone is too hot to hold comfortably, and I'm riding in an elevator, and have no place to put the phone while fanning, and nothing to fan it with anyway.To be fair, if my phone was hot, I would remove the case if I had one one it, then fan the phone for a bit before placing it in my bag[.]
I find it amazing that a suit was filed within days. So the lawyer was able to get a lab to look at it, get all the witnesses, and get her statements all in order and then quickly get it filed.
From what I'm reading, it seems like there's only this one incident. Everyone remember the Samsung Messages bug from the S9+ which would supposedly send pictures to random people (which even I thought I'd experienced)? It seemed to be a few isolated incidents, and wasn't deemed a systematic issue with the phone. I'm guessing the same thing is going to be the case here since it's been several days without reports of further incidents.
It's just incredible they haven't learned anything from the previous battery fires.
A removable battery is such a simple fix, now if they do a recall it will be expensive and inconvenient. And both of these will be passed onto the consumer.