Note 4 Is no ip67 a deal breaker?

[worwig]

Re: Is no ip67 a deal breaker?

An IP67 rated device would not be much use if exposed to rain while mounted on a motorcycle going at highway or even residental street speeds if I understand the IP67 rating for water resistance.

Irrelevant.

It is mounted behind the windshield on all of my bikes. My S4 just gets water splashed on the screen when it rains. But it would be nice to not worry about that.
But then now I need to worry about losing the stylus. ??????

 

[worwig]

Re: Is no ip67 a deal breaker?

An IP67 rated device would not be much use if exposed to rain while mounted on a motorcycle going at highway or even residental street speeds if I understand the IP67 rating for water resistance.

Irrelevant.

It is mounted behind the windshield on all of my bikes. My S4 just gets water splashed on the screen when it rains. But it would be nice to not worry about that.
But then now I need to worry about losing the stylus.

 

[smooth4lyfe]

Re: Is no ip67 a deal breaker?

Honestly, its a slight dealbreaker to me coming from the Galaxy S5, which is why I went with the Xperia Z3 instead of the Note 4
I have used my S5 at amusement parks and its actually pretty awesome going underwater

But nevertheless, the Note 4 will be an amazing beast!

 

[dankev]

Re: Is no ip67 a deal breaker?

I'm not sure if it's a deal breaker for me. I go kayaking a lot with my family, and I'd love to be able to keep my phone in my PFD pocket for easy photo access. If the Note 4 was waterproof, I'd almost certainly get it. As it is, I'll wait to see how the Nexus 6 compares to it. I'd get the Z3, but I've heard too many negative things about the Z series. I'll still consider it, though.

 

[smooth4lyfe]

Re: Is no ip67 a deal breaker?

I'm not sure if it's a deal breaker for me. I go kayaking a lot with my family, and I'd love to be able to keep my phone in my PFD pocket for easy photo access. If the Note 4 was waterproof, I'd almost certainly get it. As it is, I'll wait to see how the Nexus 6 compares to it. I'd get the Z3, but I've heard too many negative things about the Z series. I'll still consider it, though.

What negative things have u heard about the Z series?

 

[rushmore]

67 would have made the phone bigger. That probably would have hurt sales a lot more than not having the standard.

 

[dankev]

Re: Is no ip67 a deal breaker?

What negative things have u heard about the Z series?

The two main things that have turned me off: Supposedly soft, easily scratchable glass; Sony generally doesn't honor the waterproofing warranty. I don't know how true either is, but it's enough to make me think twice.

 

[anon(5630457)]

Well, I'm an archaeologist so I work outside all the time. I wish all phones would have standard waterproof and dustproof by now. I currently own the LG G3 and take my phone out with me into the field. However, I have to keep it in my waterproof backpack because the phone itself isn't waterproof. It's a minor inconvenience, but not a deal breaker.

 

[I Can Be Your Hero]

Re: Is no ip67 a deal breaker?

Not a deal breaker for me. Sure it's nice to have, but if it has to have those flaps, then I'm happy to pass on it.

 

[jlczl]

I don't have much need to upgrade since I'm currently on an S5 Active but I did preorder it. I am still not sure if I'll go thru with the purchase though. Because:

1. Not IP67
2. Painted band
3. Possible gaps
4. Locked BL

However, the $200 Samsung preorder discount coupled with the $100 bill credit from at&t for porting my line is tugging at me really hard.

Posted via the Android Central App

 

[Edgar702]

I don't think that it can be waterproof with those gaps around the screen.

 

[Almeuit]

I don't think that it can be waterproof with those gaps around the screen.

Nope. Also the S-Pen would make it a little more difficult I believe.

 

[Edgar702]

Nope. Also the S-Pen would make it a little more difficult I believe.

True.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[CampCash]

After dropping my S5 in a river last week while fly fishing on vacation, I have decided to stick with the S5. I was taking a couple of pictures, then dropped it. I could not find it among the rocks in the river bed (Very cold water too.) for a minute. Found it on the bottom in perfect working order and has continued since.

If the Note4 was waterproof, I would make the step.

 

[Ahmad Nassr]

Re: Is no ip67 a deal breaker?

Looks awesome, and gives me the potential I need.

 

[Preach2k]

Re: Is no ip67 a deal breaker?

Not a deal Breaker for me. I could just get a waterproof case. But since I have not had any problems with my GNote3 not being waterproof. I really do not think I will have any problems with My GNote4.
Seidio Obex Case for the GNote3. I am sure they will make one for the Gnote4.

 

[Bckeye]

This is the only thing that keeps me leaning towards the Z3. I'm very active with my phones and always find the back covers wet inside.

That being said... has anyone had experience with Liquipel or any other similar coating?? It seems pricey, but worth the peace of mind if it does as it says.

 

[Paul An]

Re: Is no ip67 a deal breaker?

No need for a tablet underwater xD

 

[CampCash]

The waterproof cases make the phones much larger. They also cover the screen. I prefer uncovered glass on my phones. With the S5, I am able to keep a simple cover on the phone and remain water tight.

 

[Almeuit]

The waterproof cases make the phones much larger. They also cover the screen. I prefer uncovered glass on my phones. With the S5, I am able to keep a simple cover on the phone and remain water tight.

Yep that is why they made it water resistant . The Note 4 they didn't... reason? No one knows for sure but probably something to do with the S-Pen.