ericizzy1
Well-known member
and, its not as wide as the evo (fits better in the hand) , its faster even with 2.1, no screen protector needed, etc...
easy decision for me.
easy decision for me.
I think everyone who is disappointed with Sammy/Sprint about Froyo needs to either..
1. Stick it out with Eclair until the official build does come out.
2. Go with the leaked DK-28 Froyo and/or root the phone and check out the custom ROMs offered and be A LOT happier than you are now.
Why I say this? Because I've watched all the complaining about GPS, no Flash, no option to move to SD card and other Froyo options and if you did check out the leaked and/or root and custom ROMs we are having almost no problems at all and we are enjoying those features now...
Even once Froyo is dropped finally, its either going to be 100% right from the start or require a few updates like the Evo and other devices that have been running Froyo to get the Froyo bugs worked out...
Note: These are my opinions, don't take it the wrong way just pointing out some options that people seem to keep overlooking...
I think everyone who is disappointed with Sammy/Sprint about Froyo needs to either..
1. Stick it out with Eclair until the official build does come out.
2. Go with the leaked DK-28 Froyo and/or root the phone and check out the custom ROMs offered and be A LOT happier than you are now.
Why I say this? Because I've watched all the complaining about GPS, no Flash, no option to move to SD card and other Froyo options and if you did check out the leaked and/or root and custom ROMs we are having almost no problems at all and we are enjoying those features now...
Even once Froyo is dropped finally, its either going to be 100% right from the start or require a few updates like the Evo and other devices that have been running Froyo to get the Froyo bugs worked out...
Note: These are my opinions, don't take it the wrong way just pointing out some options that people seem to keep overlooking...
the problem is that the average consumer is not comfortable with rooting or replacing their stock ROMs. Therefore the manufacturers/carriers need to step up to the plate and do right by the consumer.
Four months after this phone was released, still no Froyo? Wow! That's pretty sad.
10 million Galaxy S phones sold worldwide, yet none in the U.S. have Froyo. Wow! That's pretty sad.
Android is better than iPhone, but only if you have 2.2 - which I don't have... still. Wow! That's pretty sad.
Without 2.2 my Epic is about as useless as an iPhone. I bought an Android phone so I could watch Flash videos. The clerk at the Sprint store told me in September, the update would be out in WEEKS (Yes, I know 80% of Sprint employees will say anything to sell a phone).
And where's Android Central today, following up on its reporting on a Dec. 26 release date? There's not one post about it.
That release date was probably the original release date for that crappy 2.2 leak that came out a few weeks ago. Even Sprint said the software failed testing and the release was delayed.
Oh well, at least I can play with 2.2 on my friend's Evo (which has one of the worst screens ever imho).
What's with all the Samsung bashing? Non-US Epics have Froyo, right? So isn't Sprint the guilty party?
Agree, either deal with it, or do something about it. We'll see how long I can hold out. I just don't want to take the time messing with my phone if the update is right around the corner.
what other company has the epic
I guess I was remembering reports of other Galaxy S phones getting Froyo. So maybe my point should be that the other US Galaxy S users should be more pissed than us--but at their CARRIERS, not Samsung.
I can't say I'm not a bit disappointed but the only things I am looking forward to with froyo are the apps to sd and flash. I am not having any gps issues since applying the GPS fix here in this forum.
I would root, change roms and load froyo as a lot of you have done but what would it do to my warranty? I pay the $7/month for the insurance and will it still cover a rooted phone?