Wait, aren't you a fan of Windows?
Sure I've done, but I've also used android all along since Cupcake and my current daily is a Sony Xperia X on 7.1.1 Nougat. Iterations I have skipped since would be Donut, Gingerbread and Oreo.
Being a fan of one thing and practiced at another are not mutually exclusive so there is no real point in your mentioning what I'm a fan of... Is my pedigree in question? Please ask if you have questions. Should I supply a resume? Do I need one?
Microsoft's policies and practices on data collection, usage and sharing are far worse.
Written policies and my experience are two separate things.
In my experience Microsoft is 90% interested in telemetry gathering to improve on their product by collecting data from real world use and the tools to eliminate or reduce tracking are fairly easy to find and straightforward.
Further in my experience, taming Google/Android data gathering is less straightforward and takes a lot more time and effort and they are 75% concerned with with what I look at in order to tailor advertising to me and they want to decide for me what I should buy and from whom.
Also, Google AKA Android used to be much better about user privacy, but they have morphed into a greed machine (beginning somewhere after phones and tablets merged under ICS and getting progressively worse since) and they are obsessed with the idea that each and every being exists as part of a herd of advertising consumption beasts and not customers. Their true customer has become Advertisers and not users. We are now a tool to them. A means to make ever increasing $. This is the corporate way.
And here's the difference. Microsoft makes money primarily off software and services so they want those to be consumer friendly. Google makes money from advertising as the vast majority of their revenue so they want to push ads at all costs, including the cost of your privacy. Not your privacy exposed to the governments of the world, by and large, because we are "their herds" and they want us feeding from their trough. Rather the cost of your privacy being negligible for THEM as we are "under their care" and they know best what it is we should be "fed." They've now taken the further step of curating not just how we see ads, but have determined that the sanctity of their right to serve ads should now affect what content we should see lest it impact their ability to serve those ads. I am of course speaking about the recent upheavals over at YouTube such as the Adpocolypse and the new shadow banning practices. Couched under the guise of altruistically protecting people from "wrong think" (and don't get me started on why in the name of all that is wholesome and good a corporation should never be allowed to be the arbiter of independent persons thoughts). Under this excuse of "protection" they are merely trying to prevent advertiser withdrawal. If advertisers didn't complain about the content things would have gone merrily along as they had been. Altruism has little to nothing to do with it except as the misguided notion that Big Google knows best.
That doesn't excuse anything that Google does...
Just as you said, whatever A does should not be used to excuse B's behavior. So all you've done is try and cast an aspersion toward me for being "a fan of Windows" (and I guess that must be "wrong think") before introducing a straw man argument which you yourself conclude is meaningless.
...some perspective can be useful.
I agree. Funny how my perspective helps form my opinion. How else should it be? Again I think this is a dig at my pedigree to try and establish that I have no personal experience on which to form opinion. I ask again, do I need a resume on file to chronicle my tech experience before I can submit an opinion? You've not addressed the opinion at all, just myself and my qualifications.