Yes. I'll update after a few charge cycles to try to understand why the display eats the juice.
I have my brightness at the absolute minimum but it still soaks 50 odd %.
At automatic screen brightness on the first day was taking 67%.
As you can see by the stats, all else seems stable on the battery sapping side.
Do you guys think maybe the LCD is less energy efficient than the amoled displays?
??? It's a big display with a lot of pixels. Pretty much on par with what I'm seeing.
Pro tip: Don't do a Google Hangout on 3G. It's murder on the battery.![]()
Thats not bad stats for a android and the battery is just breaking in, i would like to see the battery after a month.
Thats not bad stats for a android and the battery is just breaking in, i would like to see the battery after a month.
It's not as good as Phil's review device. But I would also like to see some updates over the next few weeks. And I'm wondering if he's already conditioned the battery or if this was just charge and go.
SAMOLED is typically not as efficient as LCD on battery. But it's easier to manage how much battery SAMOLED uses, because if you use a lot of black themes or things with black as the background then those pixels never light up, so they don't use battery. So all things being equal LCD should be more efficient, but you can coax SAMOLED into being somewhat battery sipping.
From what i head the original amoled was a battery save screen, but the new super amoled is just the same as a led screen with battery life. I think thats why the nokia lumia 900 has the original amoled display.
That is exactly what I was thinking, if you can get between 12-14 hours under normal/heavy use this is better than most androids on the market.
As long as I can get a full day under normal use I am happy...for me that is in the 15 hour range.
Ended up getting 24 hours on that single charge.
Simply amazed.
Ended up getting 24 hours on that single charge.
Simply amazed.